Melton, Courtney B

Reside, April E

Simmonds, Jeremy S

Mcdonald, Paul G

Major, Richard E

Crates, Ross

Catterall, Carla P

Clarke, Michael F

Grey, Merilyn J

Davitt, Galen

Ingwersen, Dean

Robinson, Doug

Maron, Martine

2021-12

<p>Controlling problem species for conservation can be fraught, particularly when native species are subject to lethal control. The noisy miner (<i>Manorina melanocephala</i>), has been the target of numerous lethal control efforts. Outcomes of these noisy miner removals have varied substantially, so identifying the circumstances under which they are effective is essential for ethical and effective management. We compiled data for all identified noisy miner removals (<i>n</i> = 45), including both permit-based and unofficial removals. We investigated whether methodological and ecological factors explained the effectiveness of removals in reducing noisy miner density or increasing woodland bird richness and abundance. The only predictor of any measure of success was time between first and final culls which was positively related to reduction in noisy miner density. Surprisingly, despite removals mainly failing to reduce noisy miner density to below a threshold above which noisy miners impact smaller birds, woodland birds usually still increased. Disrupted social structure as noisy miners recolonized may have led to less effective aggressive exclusion of small birds. Further removals may not need to reduce noisy miner density to below this threshold to benefit woodland birds, but consistent monitoring and reporting would support better evaluation of effectiveness and correlates of success.</p>

Conservation Science and Practice, 3(12), p. 1-15

2578-4854

https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/55706

en

John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Attribution 4.0 International

Evaluating the evidence of culling a native species for conservation benefits

Journal Article

Publication