Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/55090
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHall, Mark Aen
dc.contributor.authorStavert, Jamie Ren
dc.contributor.authorSaunders, Manu Een
dc.contributor.authorBarr, Shannonen
dc.contributor.authorHaberle, Simon Gen
dc.contributor.authorRader, Rominaen
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-05T04:21:37Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-05T04:21:37Z-
dc.date.issued2022-06-
dc.identifier.citationEcological Applications, 32(4), p. 1-17en
dc.identifier.issn1939-5582en
dc.identifier.issn1051-0761en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/55090-
dc.description.abstractFlower visitors use different parts of the landscape through the plants they visit, however these connections vary within and among land uses. Identifying which flower-visiting insects are carrying pollen, and from where in the landscape, can elucidate key pollen–insect interactions and identify the most important sites for maintaining community-level interactions across land uses. We developed a bipartite meta-network, linking pollen–insect interactions with the sites they occur in. We used this to identify which land-use types at the site- and landscape-scale (within 500 m of a site) are most important for conserving pollen–insect interactions. We compared pollen–insect interactions across four different land uses (remnant native forest, avocado orchard, dairy farm, rotational potato crop) within a mosaic agricultural landscape. We sampled insects using flight intercept traps, identified pollen carried on their bodies and quantified distinct pollen–insect interactions that were highly specialized to both natural and modified land uses. We found that sites in crops and dairy farms had higher richness of pollen–insect interactions and higher interaction strength than small forest patches and orchards. Further, many interactions involved pollinator groups such as flies, wasps, and beetles that are often under-represented in pollen–insect network studies, but were often connector species in our networks. These insect groups require greater attention to enable wholistic pollinator community conservation. Pollen samples were dominated by grass (Poaceae) pollen, indicating anemophilous plant species may provide important food resources for pollinators, particularly in modified land uses. Field-scale land use (within 100 m of a site) better predicted pollen–insect interaction richness, uniqueness, and strength than landscape-scale. Thus, management focused at smaller scales may provide more tractable outcomes for conserving or restoring pollen–insect interactions in modified landscapes. For instance, actions aimed at linking high-richness sites with those containing unique (i.e., rare) interactions by enhancing floral corridors along field boundaries and between different land uses may best aid interaction diversity and connectance. The ability to map interactions across sites using a meta-network approach is practical and can inform land-use planning, whereby conservation efforts can be targeted toward areas that host key interactions between plant and pollinator species.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Incen
dc.relation.ispartofEcological Applicationsen
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.titlePollen-insect interaction meta-networks identify key relationships for conservation in mosaic agricultural landscapesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/eap.2537en
dcterms.accessRightsUNE Greenen
local.contributor.firstnameMark Aen
local.contributor.firstnameJamie Ren
local.contributor.firstnameManu Een
local.contributor.firstnameShannonen
local.contributor.firstnameSimon Gen
local.contributor.firstnameRominaen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailmhall54@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailjstaver3@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailmsaund28@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailrrader@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeUnited States of Americaen
local.identifier.runningnumbere2537en
local.format.startpage1en
local.format.endpage17en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume32en
local.identifier.issue4en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameHallen
local.contributor.lastnameStaverten
local.contributor.lastnameSaundersen
local.contributor.lastnameBarren
local.contributor.lastnameHaberleen
local.contributor.lastnameRaderen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:mhall54en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:msaund28en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:rraderen
local.profile.orcid0000-0003-0645-8277en
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-9056-9118en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/55090en
local.date.onlineversion2022-01-17-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitlePollen-insect interaction meta-networks identify key relationships for conservation in mosaic agricultural landscapesen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteUNE Postdoctoral Research Fellowship, Endeavor Postdoctoral Research Fellowshipen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorHall, Mark Aen
local.search.authorStavert, Jamie Ren
local.search.authorSaunders, Manu Een
local.search.authorBarr, Shannonen
local.search.authorHaberle, Simon Gen
local.search.authorRader, Rominaen
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/16827a58-b949-439b-b9d2-4014c94d3a96en
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.available2022en
local.year.published2022en
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/16827a58-b949-439b-b9d2-4014c94d3a96en
local.fileurl.openpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/16827a58-b949-439b-b9d2-4014c94d3a96en
local.subject.for2020310302 Community ecology (excl. invasive species ecology)en
local.subject.seo2020280101 Expanding knowledge in the agricultural, food and veterinary sciencesen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeExternal Affiliationen
local.profile.affiliationtypeUNE Affiliationen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/PollenInsectInteractionHallStavertSaundersBarrRader2022JournalArticle.pdf1.06 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Nov 2, 2024

Page view(s)

280
checked on Nov 19, 2023

Download(s)

4
checked on Nov 19, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons