The Clothes Maketh the Cult

Title
The Clothes Maketh the Cult
Publication Date
2023-03-14
Author(s)
Nolan, Huw
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1712-8855
Email: hnolan3@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:hnolan3
Wise, Jenny
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0838-7265
Email: jwise7@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:jwise7
McLean, Lesley
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4279-3945
Email: lmclean4@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:lmclean4
Type of document
Journal Article
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Queensland University of Technology, Creative Industries Faculty
Place of publication
Australia
DOI
10.5204/mcj.2971
UNE publication id
une:1959.11/55058
Abstract

Many people interpret the word 'cult' through specific connotations, including, but not limited to, a community of like-minded people on the edge of civilization, often led by a charismatic leader, with beliefs that are 'other' to societal 'norms'. Cults are often perceived as deviant, regularly incorporating elements of crime, especially physical and sexual violence. The adoption by some cults of a special uniform or dress code has been readily picked up by popular culture and has become a key 'defining' characteristic of the nature of a cult.

In this article, we use the semiotic framework of myth, as discussed by Barthes, to demonstrate how cult uniforms become semiotic myths of popular culture. Narratively, the myth of the cult communicates violence, deviance, manipulation, and brainwashing. The myth of on-screen cults has derived itself from a reflexive pop culture foundation. From popular culture inspiring cults to cults inspiring popular culture and back again, society generates its cult myth through three key mechanisms: medicalisation, deviance amplification, and convergence. This means we are at risk of misrepresenting the true nature of cults, creating a definition incongruent with reality.

This article traces the history of cults, the expectations of cult behaviour, and the semiotics of uniforms to start the discussion on why society is primed to accept a confusion between nature and the semiotic messaging of "what-goes-without-saying" (Barthes Mythologies 11).

Link
Citation
M/C Journal, 26(1), p. 1-10
ISSN
1441-2616
Start page
1
End page
10
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink
openpublished/TheClothesNolanWiseMcLean2023JournalArticle.pdf 292.403 KB application/pdf Published version View document