Behavioural research in health: individual subject vs person in context

Title
Behavioural research in health: individual subject vs person in context
Publication Date
1996
Author(s)
Noble, William
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1719-0181
Email: wnoble@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:wnoble
Editor
Editor(s): Jeanne Daly
Type of document
Book Chapter
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Allen & Unwin
Place of publication
St Leonards, Australia
UNE publication id
une:1959.11/54059
Abstract

The question of taking individuals as isolated subjects versus taking them as persons in contexts has obvious methodological implications in terms of what researchers, and ultimately practitioners, will attend to concerning their participants or clients. This has ethical importance inasmuch as anything taken to be beneficial to another human being under, say, the isolated-subject approach, may be seen as less than beneficial when considered from the person-in-context approach Psychologists in the positivist tradition are very much oriented to assessing features of individuals as isolated possessors of attributes varying in value (personality traits, IQ); inadequate attention has been paid to the historical, sociopolitical and microsocial contexts within which individual functioning is intelligible, an argument that taken various forms (Bevan and Kessel, 1994; Danziger, 1980; John, 1994).

This chapter uses the particular case of research directed to the delivery of aural rehabilitation services to illustrate the force of taking an individualist rather than a contextualist approach. Doubtless, some features of what is discussed will be peculiar to that arena; the general issues surely apply to other forms of research work associated with health and well-being.

Link
Citation
Ethical intersections: Health research, methods and researcher responsibility, p. 116-126
ISBN
9781864480504
Start page
116
End page
126

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink