Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/53745
Title: Is accurate routine cancer prognostication psychologically harmful? 5-year outcomes of life expectancy prognostication in uveal melanoma survivors
Contributor(s): Brown, Stephen L  (author)orcid ; Fisher, Peter (author); Hope-Stone, Laura (author); Damato, Bertil (author); Heimann, Heinrich (author); Hussain, Rumana (author); Cherry, M Gemma (author)
Publication Date: 2022-04-19
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.1007/s11764-021-01036-4
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/53745
Abstract: Purpose Prognostication in cancer is growing in importance as increasingly accurate tools are developed. Prognostic accuracy intensifies ethical concerns that a poor prognosis could be psychologically harmful to survivors. Uveal melanoma (UM) prognostication allows survivors to be reliably told that life expectancy is either normal (good prognosis) or severely curtailed because of metastatic disease (poor prognosis). Treatment cannot change life expectancy. To identify whether prognosis is associated with psychological harm, we compared harm in UM survivors with good and poor prognoses and those who declined testing and compared these outcomes to general population norms.
Methods Non-randomized 5-year study of a consecutive series of 708 UM survivors (51.6% male, mean age 69.03, SD=12.12) with observations at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months. We operationalized psychological harm as anxiety and depression symptoms, worry about cancer recurrence (WREC) and poor quality of life (QoL).
Results Compared to other groups, survivors with poor prognoses showed initially elevated anxiety and depression and consistently elevated worry about local or distant recurrence over 5 years. Good prognoses were not associated with outcomes. Generally, no prognostic groups reported anxiety, depression and WREC or QoL scores that exceeded general population norms.
Conclusions Using a large sample, we found that harm accruing from a poor prognosis was statistically significant over 5 years, but did not exceed general non-cancer population norms.
Implications for Cancer Survivors Survivors desire prognostic information. At a population level, we do not believe that our findings show sufficiently strong links between prognostication outcome and psychological harm to deny patients the option of knowing their prognosis. Nonetheless, it is important that patients are informed of potential adverse psychological consequences of a poor prognosis.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 16(2), p. 408-420
Publisher: Springer New York LLC
Place of Publication: United States of America
ISSN: 1932-2267
1932-2259
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 520302 Clinical psychology
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 200409 Mental health
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Psychology

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/IsAccurateBrown2022JournalArticle.pdfPublished version1.37 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

8
checked on Apr 6, 2024

Page view(s)

294
checked on Mar 7, 2023

Download(s)

8
checked on Mar 7, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons