Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/52777
Title: Nestling sex does not influence provisioning effort of parents or helpers in a cooperative bird with a male-biased helper contingent
Contributor(s): Barati, Ahmad  (author); Andrew, Rose L  (author)orcid ; McDonald, Paul G  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2021-06-19
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-021-03038-9
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/52777
Abstract: In cooperatively breeding species, the level of investment by both breeders and helpers may be influenced by the sex of offspring in broods that they attend, due to different fitness payoffs associated with investing in male versus female offspring. This might be expected if the sexes differ markedly in either the cost of their rearing, due to factors such as sexual size dimorphism, or the level of help that they may provide in later life that might benefit helpers in the future. Here we investigate how nestling sex influences the provisioning efforts provided by helpers and the subsequent growth and development of offspring in the cooperatively breeding noisy miner (Manorina melanocephala). In this species, helpers are predominantly philopatric males, as females disperse to other colonies to find breeding positions. We therefore predicted that helpers might invest more in helpful male-biased broods rather than those with dispersive female offspring, particularly if larger males required more resources than female offspring to successfully fledge. Male miners grew faster, fledging at the same age as their female siblings but with a heavier body mass. Male offspring therefore possibly require more resources than female offspring to raise. However, despite possible differences in the fitness returns of investing in different sexes, we were unable to detect any significant influence of brood sex ratio on the provisioning rate of pair or their helper contingent. Noisy miner helpers provision the brood irrespective of offspring sex. This could be due to an inability to recognise nestling sex, or potential future costs that might be imposed by philopatric males that subsequently compete for resources and/or mating opportunities with the helpers that reared them. From a male helper perspective, these potential costs may ultimately nullify benefits that male offspring provide in future.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 75(6), p. 1-11
Publisher: Springer
Place of Publication: Germany
ISSN: 1432-0762
0340-5443
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 310901 Animal behaviour
310405 Evolutionary ecology
310408 Life histories
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 280102 Expanding knowledge in the biological sciences
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
checked on Mar 23, 2024

Page view(s)

1,054
checked on Feb 25, 2024

Download(s)

4
checked on Feb 25, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.