Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/52088
Title: A conceptual framework for ecological responses to groundwater regime alteration (FERGRA)
Contributor(s): Kath, Jarrod (author); Boulton, Andrew J  (author); Harrison, Evan T (author); Dyer, Fiona J (author)
Publication Date: 2018-10
Early Online Version: 2018-07-07
DOI: 10.1002/eco.2010
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/52088
Abstract: 

Globally, the provision of groundwater‐supported ecosystem services is threatened by climate change, water extraction, and other activities that alter groundwater regimes (defined as temporal dynamics in groundwater pressures, storage, and levels). Research on how altered groundwater regimes affect the ecology and ecosystem services of diverse groundwater‐dependent ecosystems (GDEs) is currently fragmented with little integration across different GDEs, hampering our ability to understand and manage ecological responses to anthropogenic changes to groundwater regimes. To address this, we present a framework for assessing ecological responses to groundwater regime alteration (FERGRA). FERGRA is a logical approach to investigating how alterations to groundwater regimes change the timing, variability, duration, frequency, and magnitude of groundwater connections to different GDEs, in turn affecting their ecological processes and ecosystem service provision. Using FERGRA, multiple GDEs can be assessed concurrently, optimizing their integrated management. Unifying the concepts of ecological responses to altered groundwater regimes and groundwater connections of different GDEs across the landscape, FERGRA provides a framework for (a) organizing the currently fragmented research on GDEs to better identify commonalities and knowledge gaps, (b) formulating and testing hypotheses for quantifying ecological responses to groundwater regime alteration in GDEs to derive general principles to guide research and management, and (c) facilitating assessments of the trade‐offs between the benefits of groundwater extraction (e.g., to support mining and agriculture) versus conservation of GDEs to protect other ecosystem services.

Publication Type: Review
Source of Publication: Ecohydrology, v.11 (7)
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 1936-0592
1936-0584
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 370703 Groundwater hydrology
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 280111 Expanding knowledge in the environmental sciences
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: D1 A Substantial Review of an Entire Field of Study
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
closedpublished/AConceptualBoulton2018JournalArticle.pdf1.4 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

21
checked on Mar 23, 2024

Page view(s)

1,174
checked on Mar 31, 2024

Download(s)

126
checked on Mar 31, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.