Hardy, Joy

McPhan, Greg

Pegg, John

2021-07-27

<p>This report provides updated evidence-based advice on the selection of evidence sets to include in National Evidence for use in Stage 1 jurisdictional/sectoral moderation processes. The updated advice follows input from the ACT Teacher Quality Institute on the results of the Certification Pilot (Pegg, McPhan, & Hardy, 2013). This report should be read in conjunction with <i>Moderation Advice</i>, which outlines a proposed moderation process than can be implemented within jurisdictions/sectors. The advice on moderation and National Evidence have been provided within a broader project (20-278).</p><p> This report identifies evidence sets that would be appropriate for jurisdictions/sectors to utilise in assessing assessor accuracy at the beginning of the Stage 1 moderation process proposed in <i>Moderation Advice</i>. The evidence sets that have been reviewed have been sourced from both successful and unsuccessful Certification applications. Therefore, the range includes evidence sets that clearly meet Descriptors/Standards, are borderline or clearly do not meet Descriptors/Standards.</p>

https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/51964

en

University of New England, SiMERR National Research Centre

AITSL 20-278 National Evidence

Research Report For An External Body - Industry Report

Publication