Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers||Contributor(s):||Moser, Gerhard (author); Tier, Bruce (author); Crump, Ronald (author); Khatkar, Mehar S (author); Raadsma, Herman W (author)||Publication Date:||2009||DOI:||10.1186/1297-9686-41-56||Handle Link:||https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/4934||Abstract:||Background: Genomic selection (GS) uses molecular breeding values (MBV) derived from dense markers across the entire genome for selection of young animals. The accuracy of MBV prediction is important for a successful application of GS. Recently, several methods have been proposed to estimate MBV. Initial simulation studies have shown that these methods can accurately predict MBV. In this study we compared the accuracies and possible bias of five different regression methods in an empirical application in dairy cattle. Methods: Genotypes of 7,372 SNP and highly accurate EBV of 1,945 dairy bulls were used to predict MBV for protein percentage (PPT) and a profit index (Australian Selection Index, ASI). Marker effects were estimated by least squares regression (FR-LS), Bayesian regression (Bayes-R), random regression best linear unbiased prediction (RR-BLUP), partial least squares regression (PLSR) and nonparametric support vector regression (SVR) in a training set of 1,239 bulls. Accuracy and bias of MBV prediction were calculated from cross-validation of the training set and tested against a test team of 706 young bulls. Results: For both traits, FR-LS using a subset of SNP was significantly less accurate than all other methods which used all SNP. Accuracies obtained by Bayes-R, RR-BLUP, PLSR and SVR were very similar for ASI (0.39-0.45) and for PPT (0.55-0.61). Overall, SVR gave the highest accuracy. All methods resulted in biased MBV predictions for ASI, for PPT only RR-BLUP and SVR predictions were unbiased. A significant decrease in accuracy of prediction of ASI was seen in young test cohorts of bulls compared to the accuracy derived from cross-validation of the training set. This reduction was not apparent for PPT. Combining MBV predictions with pedigree based predictions gave 1.05 - 1.34 times higher accuracies compared to predictions based on pedigree alone. Some methods have largely different computational requirements, with PLSR and RR-BLUP requiring the least computing time. Conclusions: The four methods which use information from all SNP namely RR-BLUP, Bayes-R, PLSR and SVR generate similar accuracies of MBV prediction for genomic selection, and their use in the selection of immediate future generations in dairy cattle will be comparable. The use of FR-LS in genomic selection is not recommended.||Publication Type:||Journal Article||Source of Publication:||Genetics Selection Evolution, 41(1), p. 1-16||Publisher:||BioMed Central Ltd||Place of Publication:||United Kingdom||ISSN:||1297-9686
|Fields of Research (FoR) 2008:||070201 Animal Breeding||Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008:||830302 Dairy Cattle||Peer Reviewed:||Yes||HERDC Category Description:||C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal|
|Appears in Collections:||Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit (AGBU)|
Files in This Item:
checked on Mar 11, 2023
checked on Mar 9, 2023
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.