Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/45014
Title: Use of gene expression and whole-genome sequence information to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for carcass traits in Hanwoo cattle
Contributor(s): de las Heras-Saldana, Sara  (author)orcid ; Lopez, Bryan Irvine (author); Moghaddar, Nasir  (author)orcid ; Park, Woncheoul (author); Park, Jong-eun (author); Chung, Ki Y (author); Lim, Dajeong (author); Lee, Seung H (author); Shin, Donghyun (author); van der Werf, Julius H J  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2020
Early Online Version: 2020-09-29
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-020-00574-2
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/45014
Abstract: 

Background: In this study, we assessed the accuracy of genomic prediction for carcass weight (CWT), marbling score (MS), eye muscle area (EMA) and back fat thickness (BFT) in Hanwoo cattle when using genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), weighted GBLUP (wGBLUP), and a BayesR model. For these models, we investigated the potential gain from using pre-selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) on imputed sequence data and from gene expression information. We used data on 13,717 animals with carcass phenotypes and imputed sequence genotypes that were split in an independent GWAS discovery set of varying size and a remaining set for validation of prediction. Expression data were used from a Hanwoo gene expression experiment based on 45 animals.

Results: Using a larger number of animals in the reference set increased the accuracy of genomic prediction whereas a larger independent GWAS discovery dataset improved identification of predictive SNPs. Using pre-selected SNPs from GWAS in GBLUP improved accuracy of prediction by 0.02 for EMA and up to 0.05 for BFT, CWT, and MS, compared to a 50 k standard SNP array that gave accuracies of 0.50, 0.47, 0.58, and 0.47, respectively. Accuracy of prediction of BFT and CWT increased when BayesR was applied with the 50 k SNP array (0.02 and 0.03, respectively) and was further improved by combining the 50 k array with the top-SNPs (0.06 and 0.04, respectively). By contrast, using BayesR resulted in limited improvement for EMA and MS. wGBLUP did not improve accuracy but increased prediction bias. Based on the RNA-seq experiment, we identified informative expression quantitative trait loci, which, when used in GBLUP, improved the accuracy of prediction slightly, i.e. between 0.01 and 0.02. SNPs that were located in genes, the expression of which was associated with differences in trait phenotype, did not contribute to a higher prediction accuracy.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Genetics Selection Evolution, 52(1), p. 1-16
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 1297-9686
0999-193X
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 310509 Genomics
300305 Animal reproduction and breeding
310505 Gene expression (incl. microarray and other genome-wide approaches)
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 100401 Beef cattle
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/UseOfGeneDeLasHerasSaldanaMoghaddarVanDerWerf2020JournalArticle.pdfPublished version1.98 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

30
checked on Nov 23, 2024

Page view(s)

1,328
checked on Feb 25, 2024

Download(s)

30
checked on Feb 25, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons