Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/43463
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSoleimani, Taraen
dc.contributor.authorHermesch, Susanneen
dc.contributor.authorGilbert, Heleneen
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-22T21:45:02Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-22T21:45:02Z-
dc.date.issued2021-03-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Animal Science, 99(3), p. 1-14en
dc.identifier.issn1525-3163en
dc.identifier.issn0021-8812en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/43463-
dc.description.abstract<p>We evaluated the economic and environmental impacts of strategies that incorporated selection for pig feed efficiency and dietary optimization based on a single or multiple objectives tailored to meet the population nutritional requirements, with the goal to optimize sustainable <i>farm feed efficiency</i>. The economic and environmental features of the strategy were evaluated using life cycle assessment (<b>LCA</b>) and bio-economic models. An individual trait-based LCA model was applied to evaluate global warming potential, terrestrial acidification potential, freshwater eutrophication potential (<b>EP</b>), and land occupation of the combined genetics and nutrition optimization to produce 1 kg of live pig weighing 120 kg at the farm gate. A parametric individual trait-based bio-economic model was developed and applied to determine the cost breakdown, revenue, and profit to be gained from a 120-kg live pig at the farm gate. Data from two genetic lines with contrasted levels of feed efficiency were used to apply the combined genetics and nutrition optimization: accounting for the average nutritional requirements for each line, the individual pig responses to diets formulated for least cost, least environmental impacts, or minimum combination of costs and environmental impacts objectives were predicted with INRAPorc. Significant differences in the environmental impacts (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) and profit (<i>P</i> < 0.05) between lines predicted with the same reference diet showed that selection for feed efficiency (residual feed intake) in pigs improves pig production sustainability. When pig responses were simulated with their line-optimized diets, except for EP, all the line environmental impacts were lower (<i>P</i> < 0.05) than with the reference diet. The high correlations of feed conversion ratio with the environmental impacts (> 0.82) and the profit (< -0.88) in both lines underlined the importance of feed efficiency as a lever for the sustainability of pig production systems. Implementing combined genetics and nutrition optimization, the inherent profit and environmental differences between the genetic lines were predicted to be reduced from 23.4% with the reference diet to 7.6% with the diet optimized jointly for economic and environmental objectives (joint diet). Consequently, for increased pig sustainability, diet optimization for sustainability objectives should be applied to cover the specific nutritional requirements arising in the herd from the pigs genetic level.</p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherAmerican Society of Animal Scienceen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Animal Scienceen
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleEconomic and environmental assessments of combined genetics and nutrition optimization strategies to improve the efficiency of sustainable pork productionen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jas/skab051en
dc.identifier.pmid33587146en
dcterms.accessRightsUNE Greenen
local.contributor.firstnameTaraen
local.contributor.firstnameSusanneen
local.contributor.firstnameHeleneen
local.subject.for2008070201 Animal Breedingen
local.subject.seo2008830308 Pigsen
local.profile.schoolAnimal Genetics and Breeding Uniten
local.profile.emailSusanne.Hermesch@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeUnited States of Americaen
local.identifier.runningnumberskab051en
local.format.startpage1en
local.format.endpage14en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume99en
local.identifier.issue3en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameSoleimanien
local.contributor.lastnameHermeschen
local.contributor.lastnameGilberten
dc.identifier.staffune-id:skahtenben
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-9647-5988en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/43463en
local.date.onlineversion2021-02-15-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleEconomic and environmental assessments of combined genetics and nutrition optimization strategies to improve the efficiency of sustainable pork productionen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteThis study is part of a European collaborative project (SusPig) supported by the European Research Area on Sustainable Animal (ERA-NET SUSAN) program via the French National Research Agency contract ANR-16-SUSN-0005.en
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorSoleimani, Taraen
local.search.authorHermesch, Susanneen
local.search.authorGilbert, Heleneen
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/e0f6f640-b605-4f02-bba6-fb1ac891ea45en
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.identifier.wosid000646900000012en
local.year.available2021en
local.year.published2021en
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/e0f6f640-b605-4f02-bba6-fb1ac891ea45en
local.fileurl.openpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/e0f6f640-b605-4f02-bba6-fb1ac891ea45en
local.subject.for2020300305 Animal reproduction and breedingen
local.subject.seo2020100410 Pigsen
Appears in Collections:Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit (AGBU)
Journal Article
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/EconomicHermesch2021JournalArticle.pdfPublished version457.67 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

13
checked on Jan 4, 2025

Page view(s)

1,422
checked on Mar 10, 2024

Download(s)

156
checked on Mar 10, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons