Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/37952
Title: Contemporary Practitioner Experiences of Relational Social Work: The Case of Child Welfare
Contributor(s): Morley, Louise  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2022
Early Online Version: 2021-12-05
DOI: 10.1080/0312407X.2021.2001831
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/37952
Abstract: 

Relationships are core to effective social work and provide the glue that binds diverse aspects of practice. Relational practice has come under threat in an era of managerialism, yet at the same time, it is undergoing a revitalisation in social work discourse. For practitioners on the ground, this can create something of a dilemma, because while their discipline steers them towards building relationships in their practice, their efforts are often unsupported by their organisations, which potentially adds to their workload. This paper presents Australian research that was designed to explore how social work practitioners in the child welfare field experienced the emotional labour involved in building and maintaining relationships in organisational environments characterised by economic and technical rationalism. In-depth interviews were used to explore how participants managed their feelings and the findings revealed how they had to "dig deep" into personal and professional resources to connect and converse with clients and colleagues in a meaningful way. When considered through a gendered lens, this issue raises questions about the ethics of workload distribution for relational work in a profession that is predominantly female.

IMPLICATIONS
  • The process of building relationships can be undermined by organisational environments that are heavily influenced by managerial principles and this can potentially threaten the ethos of relational practice.
  • Practitioners need to sustain critical reflection on the value of relationships in order to maintain focus on them.
  • Considering this issue through a gendered lens raises questions about the ethics of care afforded to practitioners.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Australian Social Work, 75(4), p. 458-470
Publisher: Routledge
Place of Publication: Australia
ISSN: 1447-0748
0312-407X
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 440901 Clinical social work practice
440902 Counselling, wellbeing and community services
440599 Gender studies not elsewhere classified
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 230113 Structure, delivery and resourcing
230199 Community services not elsewhere classified
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Health

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

4
checked on Jul 20, 2024

Page view(s)

1,446
checked on Jun 30, 2024

Download(s)

6
checked on Jun 30, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.