Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/3623
Title: Withdrawing, Withholding and Refusing Emergency Resuscitation
Contributor(s): Eburn, Michael E (author)
Publication Date: 1994
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/3623
Abstract: Following the advice of the State Crown Solicitor of New South Wales, issued in 1990, there has been doubt regarding the legality of "not-for-resuscitation" orders and the circumstances under which such orders may be made. Recent cases in England and New Zealand have considered the issue of the withdrawal of life-support treatment and it is suggested that the principles discussed in that context may have ramifications for Cardio-pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) decisions. In this article, those decisions are considered, along with various pieces of Australian legislation, in order to draw a conclusion as to when No-CPR orders are justified, and in what circumstances CPR may be lawfully withheld, withdrawn or refused. Proposals are advanced for law reform in order to give proper effect to the conclusions drawn.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Journal of Law and Medicine, v.2, p. 131-146
Publisher: Law Book Company
Place of Publication: North Ryde, Australia
ISSN: 1320-159X
Field of Research (FOR): 180199 Law not elsewhere classified
180110 Criminal Law and Procedure
180126 Tort Law
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Other Links: http://www.thomsonreuters.com.au/catalogue/productdetails.asp?id=965
Statistics to Oct 2018: Visitors: 117
Views: 117
Downloads: 0
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

Page view(s)

50
checked on Jan 12, 2019
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

 

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

 

Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.