Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/34949
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLees, Angela Men
dc.contributor.authorSalvin, Hannah Een
dc.contributor.authorColditz, Ian Gen
dc.contributor.authorLee, Carolineen
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-13T02:22:36Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-13T02:22:36Z-
dc.date.issued2020-01-
dc.identifier.citationAnimals, 10(1), p. 1-16en
dc.identifier.issn2076-2615en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/34949-
dc.description.abstractPrevious studies have indicated that cattle with more excitable temperaments exhibit an increased stress response. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between temperament traits, handling, and stress-induced hyperthermia (SIH) in beef cattle. Rectal temperatures (T<sub>REC</sub>, °C) of 60 purebred Angus cattle (30 heifers, 30 steers; 235.2 ± 5.11 kg) were recorded at 20 s intervals from 30 min prior to handling until two hours post handling. All cattle were exposed to a standardized handling procedure consisting of (i) being restrained in a weighing box for 30 s; (ii) being held within the crush for 30 s; and then (iii) being restrained in a head bail for 60 s. Cattle temperaments were evaluated via three traits: (1) agitometer score (AG); (2) crush score (CS); and (3) flight speed (FS) during the handling procedure. Agitometer scores and FS measures were used to describe an AG category (AG<sub>CAT</sub>) and an FS category (FS<sub>CAT</sub>) that were used to classify animals into three temperament categories: 1, calm; 2, intermediate; and 3, temperamental. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the associations between (i) AG, CS, FS, and T<sub>REC</sub> 30 min prior to entry into the weighing box (T-30) and then at 1 min intervals between time of entry into the weighing box (T0) until 10 min post-weighing (T10); and (ii) the relationship between AG, CS, and FS. The relationship between T<sub>REC</sub> and temperament traits over the 2.5 h were modeled by using a first-order autoregressive repeated measures model. Flight speed had strong to moderate associations with T<sub>REC</sub> at T-30 (r ≥ 0.37; <i>p</i> ≤ 0.006) and between T0 and T10 (r ≥ 0.36; <i>p</i> ≤ 0.01). There were moderate associations amongst T<sub>REC</sub> between T0 and T10 and CS (r ≥ 0.31; <i>p</i> ≤ 0.01). A weak relationship existed with CS (r = 0.16; <i>p</i> = 0.16). There were no associations between AG and T<sub>REC</sub> at T-30 (r ≥ −0.15; <i>p</i> = 0.84) or between T0 and T10 (r ≤ 0.04; <i>p</i> ≥ 0.4). Rectal temperature, irrespective of sex and temperament traits, was influenced by time (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), and maximum T<sub>REC</sub> (39.3 ± 0.04 °C) occurred between 4 and 5.7 min after entry into the weighing box. In addition, CS (<i>p</i> = 0.007) influenced T<sub>REC</sub> in these cattle. There were also time × temperament trait × sex interactions with the CS (<i>p</i> = 0.0003) and FSCAT (<i>p</i> = 0.043) categories; however, time × temperament trait interactions were not statistically significant. Results from this study suggest that cattle with excitable temperaments, as evaluated by FS and CS, have a greater increase in T<sub>REC</sub>. In addition, these results suggest that a relationship exists between basal T<sub>REC</sub> and FS and CS. Together, these results highlight that temperament, as assessed by FS and CS, influences both basal T<sub>REC</sub> and the peak temperature recorded following handling but does not influence the magnitude of change in T<sub>REC</sub> post handling.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherMDPI AGen
dc.relation.ispartofAnimalsen
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleThe Influence of Temperament on Body Temperature Response to Handling in Angus Cattleen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/ani10010172en
dc.identifier.pmid31968606en
dcterms.accessRightsUNE Greenen
dc.subject.keywordsstress-induced hyperthermiaen
dc.subject.keywordsexit velocityen
dc.subject.keywordsflight speeden
dc.subject.keywordsrectal temperatureen
dc.subject.keywordsstress responseen
dc.subject.keywordsAgriculture, Dairy & Animal Scienceen
dc.subject.keywordsVeterinary Sciencesen
dc.subject.keywordsAgricultureen
dc.subject.keywordscrush scoreen
local.contributor.firstnameAngela Men
local.contributor.firstnameHannah Een
local.contributor.firstnameIan Gen
local.contributor.firstnameCarolineen
local.subject.for2008060801 Animal Behaviouren
local.subject.for2008070203 Animal Managementen
local.subject.seo2008839901 Animal Welfareen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailalees4@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailclee31@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeSwitzerlanden
local.identifier.runningnumber172en
local.format.startpage1en
local.format.endpage16en
local.identifier.scopusid85078787871en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume10en
local.identifier.issue1en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameLeesen
local.contributor.lastnameSalvinen
local.contributor.lastnameColditzen
local.contributor.lastnameLeeen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:alees4en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:clee31en
local.profile.orcid0000-0003-4898-2843en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/34949en
local.date.onlineversion2020-01-20-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleThe Influence of Temperament on Body Temperature Response to Handling in Angus Cattleen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteThis project was supported by funding from Meat & Livestock Australia Ltd. (North Sydney, NSW, Australia) and the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO, Canberra, ACT, Australia), through the Animal Welfare Strategic Partnership Program.en
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorLees, Angela Men
local.search.authorSalvin, Hannah Een
local.search.authorColditz, Ian Gen
local.search.authorLee, Carolineen
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/afcb0da1-01d6-4e34-a7a2-41978dac7d4fen
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.identifier.wosid000515364400172en
local.year.available2020en
local.year.published2020en
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/afcb0da1-01d6-4e34-a7a2-41978dac7d4fen
local.fileurl.openpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/afcb0da1-01d6-4e34-a7a2-41978dac7d4fen
local.subject.for2020300302 Animal managementen
local.subject.for2020300306 Animal welfareen
local.subject.seo2020109902 Animal welfareen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/TheInfluenceLees2020JournalArticle.pdfPublished version1.51 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

32
checked on Jan 11, 2025

Page view(s)

1,380
checked on May 19, 2024

Download(s)

34
checked on May 19, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons