Subedi, DB

2022

This article examines Sri Lanka's 'illiberal' peacebuilding through the lens of what is referred to as <i>populist nationalism</i>, a distinct form of post-war political order characterised by nationalist politics with a populist orientation. It shows that the notion of 'victor's peace' has facilitated a shift from ethnolinguistic nationalism to populist nationalism. It identifies three interrelated dimensions of populist nationalism - leadership, new social polarisation, and the narratives of crisis and securitisation. This analytical framework is applied to discern how and why 'illiberal' peacebuilding emerged in post-war Sri Lanka. The article argues that populist nationalism and 'illiberal' peacebuilding have a symbiotic relationship. Populist nationalism provided political justifications to legitimise 'illiberal' peacebuilding, which, in return, empowered the war victors, disempowered conflict victims, and enabled populist-nationalist leaders to manipulate peacebuilding resources to consolidate power. Emerging as a leader-centric political discourse, populist nationalism is reinforced by new social polarisations and securitisation, which further deepens social conflicts.

Asian Studies Review, 46(2), p. 272-292

1467-8403

1035-7823

https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/31705

en

Routledge

The Emergence of Populist Nationalism and 'Illiberal' Peacebuilding in Sri Lanka

Journal Article

Publication