Reduction of Blast Fishing in Tanzania: Analysis of Outcomes and Deterrence Measures

Title
Reduction of Blast Fishing in Tanzania: Analysis of Outcomes and Deterrence Measures
Publication Date
2021-09-09
Author(s)
Hampton-Smith, Melissa
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3600-1588
Email: mhampto2@myune.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:mhampto2
Mika, Sarah
( supervisor )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0574-6835
Email: smika2@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:smika2
Bower, Deborah
( supervisor )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0188-3290
Email: dbower3@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:dbower3
Argent, Neil
( supervisor )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4005-5837
Email: nargent@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:nargent
Abstract
The Dataset for this Thesis can be accessed here: https://rune.une.edu.au/web/handle/1959.11/31604
Type of document
Thesis Masters Research
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
University of New England
Place of publication
Armidale, Australia
UNE publication id
une:1959.11/31603
Abstract
Blast fishing (known variously as dynamite and bomb fishing) has caused long-term damage to reefs and coastal livelihoods in Tanzania and across the globe for decades. Blasting reefs with explosives has provided fish for commercial and consumption purposes, but the practice has also led to large-scale destruction of coral reef ecosystems by reducing the populations of coral colonies and reef species. In 2015 and 2016, a Tanzanian government campaign against blasting was initiated along the entire coastline. Subsequently, a significant and near uniform reduction in blasting was observed. The aim of my study was to: (1) assess the current global status of blast fishing, and to elucidate broad causes, implications and solutions to the problem; (2) analyse causal factors underlying involvement in blast fishing and reduction of the activity in Tanzania; and (3) assess how Tanzania’s coastline communities and their fish stocks have been affected by the reduction of blast fishing. My literature review analysed 212 papers from seven databases and found that ineffective enforcement and governance structures drive blasting; socioeconomic causes may contribute but are not dominant. A combination of deterrence measures and co-managed marine protected areas (MPAs) emerged as the most effective solution to blasting. I surveyed 98 households and 19 fisher focus groups with 243 fishers in four Tanzanian regions with historically high levels of blast fishing. Survey sites were purposively chosen based on previous records of blasting activity, including controls with low blasting histories; respondents were systematically selected. My primary data show that the profitability of blasting is its primary cause. The government campaign against blasting is regarded by the majority of respondents as the primary cause of the reduction. Fish catches are widely reported as having increased following the campaign. These data support the literature review as well as previous studies conducted in the region. Further research incorporating geographic and market factors will deepen understanding of destructive fishing in developing coastal fisheries.
Link

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink