Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/31603
Title: | Reduction of Blast Fishing in Tanzania: Analysis of Outcomes and Deterrence Measures | Contributor(s): | Hampton-Smith, Melissa (author) ; Mika, Sarah (supervisor) ; Bower, Deborah (supervisor) ; Argent, Neil (supervisor) | Conferred Date: | 2021-09-09 | Copyright Date: | 2021 | Open Access: | Yes | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/31603 | Related DOI: | 10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109307 | Related Research Outputs: | https://rune.une.edu.au/web/handle/1959.11/31604 | Abstract: | Blast fishing (known variously as dynamite and bomb fishing) has caused long-term damage to reefs and coastal livelihoods in Tanzania and across the globe for decades. Blasting reefs with explosives has provided fish for commercial and consumption purposes, but the practice has also led to large-scale destruction of coral reef ecosystems by reducing the populations of coral colonies and reef species. In 2015 and 2016, a Tanzanian government campaign against blasting was initiated along the entire coastline. Subsequently, a significant and near uniform reduction in blasting was observed. The aim of my study was to: (1) assess the current global status of blast fishing, and to elucidate broad causes, implications and solutions to the problem; (2) analyse causal factors underlying involvement in blast fishing and reduction of the activity in Tanzania; and (3) assess how Tanzania’s coastline communities and their fish stocks have been affected by the reduction of blast fishing. My literature review analysed 212 papers from seven databases and found that ineffective enforcement and governance structures drive blasting; socioeconomic causes may contribute but are not dominant. A combination of deterrence measures and co-managed marine protected areas (MPAs) emerged as the most effective solution to blasting. I surveyed 98 households and 19 fisher focus groups with 243 fishers in four Tanzanian regions with historically high levels of blast fishing. Survey sites were purposively chosen based on previous records of blasting activity, including controls with low blasting histories; respondents were systematically selected. My primary data show that the profitability of blasting is its primary cause. The government campaign against blasting is regarded by the majority of respondents as the primary cause of the reduction. Fish catches are widely reported as having increased following the campaign. These data support the literature review as well as previous studies conducted in the region. Further research incorporating geographic and market factors will deepen understanding of destructive fishing in developing coastal fisheries. | Publication Type: | Thesis Masters Research | Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 050202 Conservation and Biodiversity 050209 Natural Resource Management 070403 Fisheries Management |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 960802 Coastal and Estuarine Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity 960808 Marine Flora, Fauna and Biodiversity 960902 Coastal and Estuarine Land Management |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | 180203 Coastal or estuarine biodiversity 180504 Marine biodiversity 180299 Coastal and estuarine systems and management not elsewhere classified |
HERDC Category Description: | T1 Thesis - Masters Degree by Research | Description: | The Dataset for this Thesis can be accessed here: https://rune.une.edu.au/web/handle/1959.11/31604 |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | School of Environmental and Rural Science School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences School of Science and Technology Thesis Masters Research |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
openpublished/HamptonSmithMelissaMSc2021Thesis.pdf | Thesis | 7.39 MB | Adobe PDF Download Adobe | View/Open |
Page view(s)
2,518
checked on Feb 25, 2024
Download(s)
1,474
checked on Feb 25, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.