Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/31531
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Paulen
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-15T05:44:51Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-15T05:44:51Z-
dc.date.issued2020-06-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/31531-
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Some have argued that past changes to the EPBC Act to add new matters of national environmental significance did not go far enough. Others have argued it has extended the regulatory reach of the Commonwealth too far. What do you think?</strong></p> <p>The national loss of biodiversity documented in the national State of Environment Report 2016, and the significant additional impacts likely with climate-related drought, fires and flood, demonstrate that environmental governance arrangements, at all levels of government, are not effective. This is for many reasons, including the relative weakness of national and state protections, the problems of non-feasibility of implementation given the available public and private resources; and the lack of a credible system to monitor and discipline effective implementation. A robust system of meta-governance of biodiversity protection is essential to provide (1) independent and scrupulous oversight of the implementation and performance of biodiversity protection at all levels; (2) a viable business model for the efficient implementation of biodiversity protection, to ensure sufficient public and private resources are deployed efficiently; (3) proper addressing of Australia's obligations under the Convention on Biodiversity to a comprehensive biodiversity governance system that does provide strong public and private economic incentives to implement protective regimes, and which does fully engage all stakeholders in effective protection and restoration.</p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherDepartmen of Agriculture, Water and Environmenten
dc.titleSubmission to the EPBC Act Review: ANON-K57V-XFUB-2en
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dcterms.accessRightsBronzeen
local.contributor.firstnamePaulen
local.subject.for2008180111 Environmental and Natural Resources Lawen
local.subject.seo2008960704 Land Stewardshipen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Lawen
local.profile.emailpmartin9@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryWen
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.url.openhttps://epbcactreview.environment.gov.au/submissions/anon-k57v-xfub-2en
local.title.subtitleANON-K57V-XFUB-2en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameMartinen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:pmartin9en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-0243-2654en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/31531en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleSubmission to the EPBC Act Reviewen
local.output.categorydescriptionW Working Paperen
local.search.authorMartin, Paulen
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.published2020en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/36116b74-d3f6-4c36-9e56-22b3c63a5221en
local.subject.for2020480204 Mining, energy and natural resources lawen
local.subject.for2020480202 Climate change lawen
dc.notification.tokenf873a928-5c96-4d93-9381-e106286a409fen
Appears in Collections:School of Law
Working Paper
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.