Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/31480
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPillai, Rishaben
dc.contributor.authorNordberg, Ericen
dc.contributor.authorRiedel, Jendrianen
dc.contributor.authorSchwarzkopf, Linen
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-08T04:04:10Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-08T04:04:10Z-
dc.date.issued2020-10-16-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Zoology, v.17, p. 1-12en
dc.identifier.issn1742-9994en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/31480-
dc.description.abstractBackground <br/> Fitness is strongly related to locomotor performance, which can determine success in foraging, mating, and other critical activities. Locomotor performance on different substrates is likely to require different abilities, so we expect alignment between species’ locomotor performance and the habitats they use in nature. In addition, we expect behaviour to enhance performance, such that animals will use substrates on which they perform well. <br/> <br/> Methods <br/> We examined the associations between habitat selection and performance in three species of Oedura geckos, including two specialists, (one arboreal, and one saxicolous), and one generalist species, which used both rocks and trees. First, we described their microhabitat use in nature (tree and rock type) for these species, examined the surface roughnesses they encountered, and selected materials with comparable surface microtopographies (roughness measured as peak-to-valley heights) to use as substrates in lab experiments quantifying behavioural substrate preferences and clinging performance. <br/> <br/> Results <br/> The three Oedura species occupied different ecological niches and used different microhabitats in nature, and the two specialist species used a narrower range of surface roughnesses compared to the generalist. In the lab, Oedura geckos preferred substrates (coarse sandpaper) with roughness characteristics similar to substrates they use in nature. Further, all three species exhibited greater clinging performance on preferred (coarse sandpaper) substrates, although the generalist used fine substrates in nature and had good performance capabilities on fine substrates as well. <br/> <br/> Conclusion <br/> We found a relationship between habitat use and performance, such that geckos selected microhabitats on which their performance was high. In addition, our findings highlight the extensive variation in surface roughnesses that occur in nature, both among and within microhabitats.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltden
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Zoologyen
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleGeckos cling best to, and prefer to use, rough surfacesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12983-020-00374-wen
dcterms.accessRightsUNE Greenen
local.contributor.firstnameRishaben
local.contributor.firstnameEricen
local.contributor.firstnameJendrianen
local.contributor.firstnameLinen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailenordber@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
local.identifier.runningnumber32en
local.format.startpage1en
local.format.endpage12en
local.identifier.scopusid85092742303en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume17en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnamePillaien
local.contributor.lastnameNordbergen
local.contributor.lastnameRiedelen
local.contributor.lastnameSchwarzkopfen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:enordberen
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-1333-622Xen
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/31480en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleGeckos cling best to, and prefer to use, rough surfacesen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteFieldwork to collect Oedura coggeri and O. monilis was funded by the Skyrail Rainforest Foundation. All other fieldwork and laboratory studies were funded by James Cook University.en
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorPillai, Rishaben
local.search.authorNordberg, Ericen
local.search.authorRiedel, Jendrianen
local.search.authorSchwarzkopf, Linen
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/3c4ab3b7-018a-4457-8289-d8c6f714f972en
local.uneassociationNoen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.published2020en
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/3c4ab3b7-018a-4457-8289-d8c6f714f972en
local.fileurl.openpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/3c4ab3b7-018a-4457-8289-d8c6f714f972en
local.subject.for2020310901 Animal behaviouren
local.subject.seo2020180606 Terrestrial biodiversityen
dc.notification.token7c251888-2dca-4812-b4b6-fd1afa12cd60en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/GeckosNordberg2020JournalArticle.pdfPublished version1.15 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
checked on Mar 23, 2024

Page view(s)

1,370
checked on Mar 31, 2024

Download(s)

20
checked on Mar 31, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons