Development and validation of explicit criteria to identify potentially inappropriate prescribing for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Title
Development and validation of explicit criteria to identify potentially inappropriate prescribing for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Publication Date
2022-06
Author(s)
Ayalew, Mohammed Biset
Dieberg, Gudrun
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7191-182X
Email: gdieberg@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:gdieberg
Quirk, Frances
Spark, M Joy
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5240-8217
Email: jspark@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:jspark
Type of document
Journal Article
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Elsevier Inc
Place of publication
United States of America
DOI
10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.07.014
UNE publication id
une:1959.11/31411
Abstract
Background
Early detection and timely resolution of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) prevents adverse outcomes and improves patient care. An explicit tool specifically designed to detect PIP among people with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) has not been published.

Objectives
This study aims to develop and validate the Inappropriate Medication Prescribing Assessment Criteria for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (IMPACT2DM); an explicit tool that can be used to identify PIP for adults with T2DM.

Methods
Current national and international guidelines for the management of T2DM and drug information software programs were used to generate potential items. The content of the IMPACT2DM was validated by 2 consecutive rounds of Delphi method. Physicians and clinical pharmacists experienced in providing care for people with diabetes and authors of selected diabetes guidelines were invited to participate in the Delphi panel. Consensus was assumed if 90% (first round) and 85% (second round) of expert panelists showed agreement to include or exclude an item.

Results
A total of 95 potential items were generated from selected diabetes guidelines and drug information software programs. After the first Delphi round 27 items had ≥90% agreement and were included in the tool; 19 items were considered not PIP and were excluded from the tool. The second round contained 49 items; of these 43 were included and 6 were excluded from the tool. The final IMPACT2DM contains 70 items categorized by type of PIP and arranged in terms of medical conditions and medication classes. IMPACT2DM can be applied using information on medical charts and requires minimal or no clinical knowledge to assess quality of diabetes care and improve medication selection.

Conclusions
IMPACT2DM has been developed from current quality evidence and undergone content validation. It is the first explicit tool specifically designed to identify PIP for adults with T2DM.
Link
Citation
Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 18(6), p. 2989-2996
ISSN
1934-8150
1551-7411
Pubmed ID
34330635
Start page
2989
End page
2996

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink