Dissent Dressing: The Colour and Fabric of Political Rage

Title
Dissent Dressing: The Colour and Fabric of Political Rage
Publication Date
2019
Author(s)
Coghlan, Jo
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6361-6713
Email: jcoghla3@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:jcoghla3
Type of document
Journal Article
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Queensland University of Technology, Creative Industries Faculty
Place of publication
Australia
DOI
10.5204/mcj.1497
UNE publication id
une:1959.11/31206
Abstract
What we wear signals our membership within groups, be theyorganised by gender, class, ethnicity or religion. Simultaneously our clothing signifies hierarchies and power relations that sustain dominant power structures. How we dress is an expression of our identity. For Veblen, how we dress expresses wealth and social stratification. In imitating the fashion of the wealthy, claims Simmel, we seek social equality. For Barthes, clothing is embedded with systems of meaning. For Hebdige, clothing has modalities of meaning depending on the wearer, as do clothes for gender (Davis) and for the body (Entwistle). For Maynard, "dress is a significant material practice we use to signal our cultural boundaries, social separations, continuities and, for the present purposes, political dissidences" (103). Clothing has played a central role in historical and contemporary forms of political dissent.
Link
Citation
M/C Journal, 22(1), p. 1-11
ISSN
1441-2616
Start page
1
End page
11
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink