Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/31098
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hester, Susie | en |
dc.contributor.author | Hauser, Cindy | en |
dc.contributor.author | Kean, John | en |
dc.contributor.author | Walshe, Terry | en |
dc.contributor.author | Robinson, Andrew | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-22T05:31:23Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-07-22T05:31:23Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010-09-03 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/31098 | - |
dc.description | ACERA Project No. 1004<br>Milestone Report 1 | en |
dc.description.abstract | <p>Post-border surveillance is undertaken for a variety of reasons: to give evidence that a pest or disease is absent from a country, region or defined area, thus enabling access to particular export markets; to detect new pests and diseases early enough to allow for cost-effective management; to establish the boundaries of a known pest or disease incursion; and to monitor the progress of existing containment or eradication programmes.</p> <p>The body of literature in these four areas is largely aimed at improving post-border surveillance systems, although much of it is inaccessible to the biosecurity decision maker who is responsible for allocating resources for surveillance. Here we provide a classification system for discussing and comparing methods and tools that can assist with post-border surveillance, with a view to creating an accessible summary of available techniques. We also include a discussion of relevant statistical and economic concepts, methods for estimating detectability, and tools for decision making in the context of post-border surveillance.</p> The purpose of this report is to create an accessible summary of available tools to assist biosecurity managers with planning, implementation and evaluation of post-border surveillance activities. The tools range in character from rules-of–thumb and simple formulae, to simulation models with user-friendly interfaces. | en |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.publisher | Australian Centre of Excellence for Risk Analysis (ACERA) | en |
dc.title | Post-border surveillance techniques: review, synthesis and deployment | en |
dc.type | Report | en |
dcterms.accessRights | Bronze | en |
local.contributor.firstname | Susie | en |
local.contributor.firstname | Cindy | en |
local.contributor.firstname | John | en |
local.contributor.firstname | Terry | en |
local.contributor.firstname | Andrew | en |
local.profile.school | UNE Business School | en |
local.profile.email | shester@une.edu.au | en |
local.output.category | R1 | en |
local.record.place | au | en |
local.record.institution | University of New England | en |
local.publisher.place | Melbourne, Australia | en |
local.format.pages | 100 | en |
local.url.open | https://cebra.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/2802463/ACERA_-1004-Milestone-Report-September-2010.pdf | en |
local.title.subtitle | review, synthesis and deployment | en |
local.access.fulltext | Yes | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Hester | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Hauser | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Kean | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Walshe | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Robinson | en |
dc.identifier.staff | une-id:shester | en |
local.profile.orcid | 0000-0001-6046-9984 | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.identifier.unepublicationid | une:1959.11/31098 | en |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
local.title.maintitle | Post-border surveillance techniques | en |
local.relation.fundingsourcenote | In preparing this report, the authors acknowledge the financial and other support provided by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF), the University of Melbourne, Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute (AMSI) and Australian Research Centre for Urban Ecology (ARCUE). This work was partially funded by New Zealand's Foundation for Research, Science and Technology through contract C02X0501, the Better Border Biosecurity (B3) programme. | en |
local.output.categorydescription | R1 Report | en |
local.search.author | Hester, Susie | en |
local.search.author | Hauser, Cindy | en |
local.search.author | Kean, John | en |
local.search.author | Walshe, Terry | en |
local.search.author | Robinson, Andrew | en |
local.uneassociation | Yes | en |
local.atsiresearch | No | en |
local.sensitive.cultural | No | en |
local.year.published | 2010 | en |
local.fileurl.closedpublished | https://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/ca407571-5112-4b32-8573-d23fcd8d0a64 | en |
local.subject.for2020 | 460507 Information extraction and fusion | en |
local.subject.seo2020 | 180602 Control of pests, diseases and exotic species in terrestrial environments | en |
Appears in Collections: | Report UNE Business School |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format |
---|
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.