Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30965
Title: The effect of habitat-specific sampling on biological assessment of water quality using a predictive model
Contributor(s): Parsons, Melissa  (author)orcid ; Norris, Richard (author)
Publication Date: 1996-10
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1996.00088.x
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30965
Abstract: 
  1. Detection of impairment in macroinvertebrate communities using rapid biological assessment depends on the ability to compare sites, with confidence that differences obtained result from water quality. However, collections from more than one habitat type may introduce variation that can potentially mask water quality differences among sites. Data were collected from the riffle, edge, pool-rock and macrophyte habitats at reference (minimally disturbed) and test (disturbed) stream sites throughout the Australian Capital Territory. The effect of habitat-specific sampling on predictive models for detecting impairment in macroinvertebrate communities was determined. Four models were used: riffle only, edge only, each habitat as an individual object, and all habitats sampled at a site considered as a composite sample.
  2. Macroinvertebrates from individual habitats generally clustered into separate groups because collections from the same habitat at different sites were more similar than collections from different habitats within a site. Thus, in the habitats as individual objects model, the taxa predicted to occur at a test site may be an indication of habitat type rather than water quality. The outputs of the composite habitats and riffle and edge models were similar. However, the variable number of habitats included at each site in the composite model may confound the detection of biological impairment because of unequal sampling effort. The riffle and edge models were the most robust because they were less confounded by inter-habitat variation and were based on comparisons made between equivalent environmental units.
  3. Comparison of observed/expected taxa ratios for test sites showed that each model could detect biological impairment, indicating considerable data redundancy was introduced by sampling several habitats. In particular, the pool-rock and macrophyte habitats contributed no information with regard to macroinvertebrate taxon occurrence or detection of biological impairment that could not be obtained from either the riffle or edge habitats within the study area.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Freshwater Biology, 36(2), p. 419-434
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 1365-2427
0046-5070
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 410402 Environmental assessment and monitoring
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 180399 Fresh, ground and surface water systems and management not elsewhere classified
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Institute for Rural Futures
Journal Article
School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

171
checked on Feb 24, 2024

Page view(s)

1,452
checked on Mar 8, 2023

Download(s)

2
checked on Mar 8, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.