Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30949
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBallester, Carlosen
dc.contributor.authorHornbuckle, Johnen
dc.contributor.authorBrinkhoff, Jamesen
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Johnen
dc.contributor.authorQuayle, Wendyen
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-06T05:23:21Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-06T05:23:21Z-
dc.date.issued2017-11-08-
dc.identifier.citationRemote Sensing, 9(11), p. 1-18en
dc.identifier.issn2072-4292en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30949-
dc.description.abstractThe present work assessed the usefulness of a set of spectral indices obtained from an unmanned aerial system (UAS) for tracking spatial and temporal variability of nitrogen (N) status as well as for predicting lint yield in a commercial cotton (<i>Gossypium hirsutum</i> L.) farm. Organic, inorganic and a combination of both types of fertilizers were used to provide a range of eight N rates from 0 to 340 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>. Multi-spectral images (reflectance in the blue, green, red, red edge and near infrared bands) were acquired on seven days throughout the season, from 62 to 169 days after sowing (DAS), and data were used to compute structure- and chlorophyll-sensitive vegetation indices (VIs). Above-ground plant biomass was sampled at first flower, first cracked boll and maturity and total plant N concentration (N%) and N uptake determined. Lint yield was determined at harvest and the relationships with the VIs explored. Results showed that differences in plant N% and N uptake between treatments increased as the season progressed. Early in the season, when fertilizer applications can still have an effect on lint yield, the simplified canopy chlorophyll content index (SCCCI) was the index that best explained the variation in N uptake and plant N% between treatments. Around first cracked boll and maturity, the linear regression obtained for the relationships between the VIs and both plant N% and N uptake was statistically significant, with the highest r<sup>2</sup> values obtained at maturity. The normalized difference red edge (NDRE) index, and SCCCI were generally the indices that best distinguished the treatments according to the N uptake and total plant N%. Treatments with the highest N rates (from 307 to 340 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>) had lower normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) than treatments with 0 and 130 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> at the first measurement day (62 DAS), suggesting that factors other than fertilization N rate affected plant growth at this early stage of the crop. This fact affected the earliest date at which the structure-sensitive indices NDVI and the visible atmospherically resistant index (VARI) enabled yield prediction (97 DAS). A statistically significant linear regression was obtained for the relationships between SCCCI and NDRE with lint yield at 83 DAS. Overall, this study shows the practicality of using an UAS to monitor the spatial and temporal variability of cotton N status in commercial farms. It also illustrates the challenges of using multi-spectral information for fertilization recommendation in cotton at early stages of the crop.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherMDPI AGen
dc.relation.ispartofRemote Sensingen
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleAssessment of In-Season Cotton Nitrogen Status and Lint Yield Prediction from Unmanned Aerial System Imageryen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/rs9111149en
dcterms.accessRightsUNE Greenen
local.contributor.firstnameCarlosen
local.contributor.firstnameJohnen
local.contributor.firstnameJamesen
local.contributor.firstnameJohnen
local.contributor.firstnameWendyen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Science and Technologyen
local.profile.emailjbrinkho@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeSwitzerlanden
local.identifier.runningnumber1149en
local.format.startpage1en
local.format.endpage18en
local.identifier.scopusid85034731862en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume9en
local.identifier.issue11en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameBallesteren
local.contributor.lastnameHornbuckleen
local.contributor.lastnameBrinkhoffen
local.contributor.lastnameSmithen
local.contributor.lastnameQuayleen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:jbrinkhoen
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-0721-2458en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/30949en
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleAssessment of In-Season Cotton Nitrogen Status and Lint Yield Prediction from Unmanned Aerial System Imageryen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteCotton Research and Development Corporation (CRDC); Deakin Universityen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorBallester, Carlosen
local.search.authorHornbuckle, Johnen
local.search.authorBrinkhoff, Jamesen
local.search.authorSmith, Johnen
local.search.authorQuayle, Wendyen
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/0cc01dc3-5257-40cf-a282-7dc0ba31674ben
local.uneassociationNoen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.year.published2017en
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/0cc01dc3-5257-40cf-a282-7dc0ba31674ben
local.fileurl.openpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/0cc01dc3-5257-40cf-a282-7dc0ba31674ben
local.subject.for2020300407 Crop and pasture nutritionen
local.subject.seo2020260401 Cotton lint and cotton seeden
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Science and Technology
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/AssessmentBrinkhoff2017JournalArticle.pdfPublished version5.47 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

66
checked on Aug 17, 2024

Page view(s)

1,054
checked on Mar 8, 2023

Download(s)

18
checked on Mar 8, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons