Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30897
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKolakshyapati, Manishaen
dc.contributor.authorBailey, Craigen
dc.contributor.authorSibanda, Terence Zimazileen
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, Natalieen
dc.contributor.authorRuhnke, Isabelleen
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-01T00:05:04Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-01T00:05:04Z-
dc.date.issued2019-09-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 103(5), p. 1427-1436en
dc.identifier.issn1439-0396en
dc.identifier.issn0931-2439en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30897-
dc.description.abstractThe titanium dioxide (TiO<sub>2</sub>) marker technique is currently widely practiced as a method to evaluate gastrointestinal (GI) passage rate in poultry. However, this method requires sacrificing the animal to obtain digesta samples, is labour-intensive and eliminates the possibility of follow-up studies with the same individual. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the radiographic methods barium-impregnated polyethylene spheres (BIPS) and barium sulphate (BaSO<sub>4</sub>) suspension are in agreement with the TiO<sub>2</sub> technique and can be used as an alternative method for GI passage rate determination in laying hens. Whole-body radiographs were taken at different time points. Hens of group 3 (<i>n</i> = 55) were orally inoculated with 5 g of feed mixed with 0.15 g TiO<sub>2</sub>, 5 hens per time point sacrificed, and whole gastrointestinal organs (crop, proventriculus, gizzard, small intestine and large intestine) were collected and analysed for TiO<sub>2</sub> content. The average marker passage rate of hens administered BaSO<sub>4</sub> was significantly faster than those administered BIPS (gizzard: 15.2 hr vs. 43.2 hr; small intestine: 15.2 hr vs. 38.4 hr, respectively). A greater percentage of BIPS remained in the crop at 0, 0.5, 2, 3 and 8 hr post-inoculation (p.i.) and in the gizzard at 2, 24, 36 and 48 hr p.i. (all <i>p</i> < 0.05) compared to TiO<sub>2</sub>. In conclusion, the evaluation of the GI transit time is feasible using BIPS, TiO<sub>2</sub> and BaSO<sub>4</sub>. The evaluation of the GI transit time using BIPS and BaSO<sub>4</sub> needs further investigation.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Verlag GmbHen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutritionen
dc.titleDetermination of gastrointestinal passage rate using three different markers in laying hensen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jpn.13145en
local.contributor.firstnameManishaen
local.contributor.firstnameCraigen
local.contributor.firstnameTerence Zimazileen
local.contributor.firstnameNatalieen
local.contributor.firstnameIsabelleen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailmkolaks2@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailtsiband2@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailnmorga20@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailiruhnke@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeGermanyen
local.format.startpage1427en
local.format.endpage1436en
local.identifier.scopusid85068923803en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume103en
local.identifier.issue5en
local.contributor.lastnameKolakshyapatien
local.contributor.lastnameBaileyen
local.contributor.lastnameSibandaen
local.contributor.lastnameMorganen
local.contributor.lastnameRuhnkeen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:mkolaks2en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:tsiband2en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:nmorga20en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:iruhnkeen
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-5999-0374en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-0056-8419en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-9663-2365en
local.profile.orcid0000-0001-5423-9306en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/30897en
local.date.onlineversion2019-07-12-
dc.identifier.academiclevelStudenten
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleDetermination of gastrointestinal passage rate using three different markers in laying hensen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorKolakshyapati, Manishaen
local.search.authorBailey, Craigen
local.search.authorSibanda, Terence Zimazileen
local.search.authorMorgan, Natalieen
local.search.authorRuhnke, Isabelleen
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.identifier.wosid000475073700001en
local.year.available2019en
local.year.published2019en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/597e39a4-e8a7-48e1-a0d0-d10743cde264en
local.subject.for2020300303 Animal nutritionen
local.subject.seo2020100411 Poultryen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

6
checked on Aug 17, 2024

Page view(s)

1,072
checked on Mar 8, 2023

Download(s)

4
checked on Mar 8, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.