Determination of gastrointestinal passage rate using three different markers in laying hens

Title
Determination of gastrointestinal passage rate using three different markers in laying hens
Publication Date
2019-09
Author(s)
Kolakshyapati, Manisha
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5999-0374
Email: mkolaks2@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:mkolaks2
Bailey, Craig
Sibanda, Terence Zimazile
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0056-8419
Email: tsiband2@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:tsiband2
Morgan, Natalie
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9663-2365
Email: nmorga20@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:nmorga20
Ruhnke, Isabelle
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5423-9306
Email: iruhnke@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:iruhnke
Type of document
Journal Article
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell Verlag GmbH
Place of publication
Germany
DOI
10.1111/jpn.13145
UNE publication id
une:1959.11/30897
Abstract
The titanium dioxide (TiO2) marker technique is currently widely practiced as a method to evaluate gastrointestinal (GI) passage rate in poultry. However, this method requires sacrificing the animal to obtain digesta samples, is labour-intensive and eliminates the possibility of follow-up studies with the same individual. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the radiographic methods barium-impregnated polyethylene spheres (BIPS) and barium sulphate (BaSO4) suspension are in agreement with the TiO2 technique and can be used as an alternative method for GI passage rate determination in laying hens. Whole-body radiographs were taken at different time points. Hens of group 3 (n = 55) were orally inoculated with 5 g of feed mixed with 0.15 g TiO2, 5 hens per time point sacrificed, and whole gastrointestinal organs (crop, proventriculus, gizzard, small intestine and large intestine) were collected and analysed for TiO2 content. The average marker passage rate of hens administered BaSO4 was significantly faster than those administered BIPS (gizzard: 15.2 hr vs. 43.2 hr; small intestine: 15.2 hr vs. 38.4 hr, respectively). A greater percentage of BIPS remained in the crop at 0, 0.5, 2, 3 and 8 hr post-inoculation (p.i.) and in the gizzard at 2, 24, 36 and 48 hr p.i. (all p < 0.05) compared to TiO2. In conclusion, the evaluation of the GI transit time is feasible using BIPS, TiO2 and BaSO4. The evaluation of the GI transit time using BIPS and BaSO4 needs further investigation.
Link
Citation
Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 103(5), p. 1427-1436
ISSN
1439-0396
0931-2439
Start page
1427
End page
1436

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink