Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30888
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, H T Ten
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, Nen
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, J Ren
dc.contributor.authorSwick, R Aen
dc.contributor.authorToghyani, Men
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-30T07:15:48Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-30T07:15:48Z-
dc.date.issued2020-12-
dc.identifier.citationPoultry Science, 99(12), p. 6964-6973en
dc.identifier.issn1525-3171en
dc.identifier.issn0032-5791en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30888-
dc.description.abstract<p>This study was designed to compare the effects of nutritional and growth-promoting levels of copper hydroxychloride (<b>CH</b>) with copper sulfate (<b>CuSO<sub>4</sub></b>) on growth, carcass characteristics, tibia traits and mineral concentration in broilers fed a conventional wheat-soybean meal-based diet. Day-old Ross 308 male chicks (<i>n</i> = 864) were randomly assigned into 8 dietary treatments with 6 replicates of 18 chicks per treatment. The dietary treatments included a basal diet containing no supplemental copper (<b>Cu</b>) serving as the negative control (<b>NC</b>); basal diet supplemented with 15 or 200 mg/kg Cu as CuSO<sub>4</sub>; basal diet supplemented with either 15, 50, 100, 150, or 200 mg/kg Cu from CH. Diets were fed over the starter (day 1–14) and grower (day 14–35) phases. Birds in the NC group gained the same body weight and had similar feed conversion ratio (FCR) to birds receiving 15 mg/kg Cu as CuSO<sub>4</sub>, but birds receiving 15 mg/kg Cu as CH had a lower FCR than the NC birds (day 0-35; <i>P</i> < 0.05). Birds fed 200 mg/kg Cu as CH gained more weight (77 g/bird) and had a lower FCR (3.2 point) compared with those fed 200 mg/kg Cu as CuSO<sub>4</sub> (<i>P</i> < 0.01). Based on broken-line regression models, the optimum inclusion level of Cu as CH in the diet for optimal body weight gain and FCR were estimated to be 109.5 and 72.3 mg/kg, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Carcass characteristics were not affected by dietary Cu sources or levels (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The highest and lowest tibia ash content were observed in birds fed diet with 150 mg/kg Cu as CH and 200 mg/kg Cu as CuSO<sub>4</sub>, respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Supplementation with 200 mg/kg Cu as CH resulted in higher duodenal mucosa Cu content compared with the diet containing 200 mg/kg Cu as CuSO<sub>4</sub> (<i>P</i> < 0.001). In conclusion, supplementation of Cu from CH was more efficacious than CuSO<sub>4</sub> in promoting growth performance, both at nutritional and pharmacological levels.</p>en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherElsevier BVen
dc.relation.ispartofPoultry Scienceen
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleCopper hydroxychloride is more efficacious than copper sulfate in improving broiler chicken's growth performance, both at nutritional and growth-promoting levelsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.053en
dcterms.accessRightsUNE Greenen
local.contributor.firstnameH T Ten
local.contributor.firstnameNen
local.contributor.firstnameJ Ren
local.contributor.firstnameR Aen
local.contributor.firstnameMen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailnmorga20@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailjrobert2@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailrswick@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailmtoghya2@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeNetherlandsen
local.format.startpage6964en
local.format.endpage6973en
local.identifier.scopusid85094891025en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume99en
local.identifier.issue12en
local.access.fulltextYesen
local.contributor.lastnameNguyenen
local.contributor.lastnameMorganen
local.contributor.lastnameRobertsen
local.contributor.lastnameSwicken
local.contributor.lastnameToghyanien
dc.identifier.staffune-id:nmorga20en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:jrobert2en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:rswicken
dc.identifier.staffune-id:mtoghya2en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-9663-2365en
local.profile.orcid0000-0003-3376-1677en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/30888en
local.date.onlineversion2020-10-09-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleCopper hydroxychloride is more efficacious than copper sulfate in improving broiler chicken's growth performance, both at nutritional and growth-promoting levelsen
local.relation.fundingsourcenoteThe authors would like to thank Trouw Nutrition, a Nutreco company for the financial support for this study.en
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorNguyen, H T Ten
local.search.authorMorgan, Nen
local.search.authorRoberts, J Ren
local.search.authorSwick, R Aen
local.search.authorToghyani, Men
local.open.fileurlhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/7f464949-7885-4c66-9d5d-606f8d0e2573en
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.identifier.wosid000595452700019en
local.year.available2020en
local.year.published2020en
local.fileurl.openhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/7f464949-7885-4c66-9d5d-606f8d0e2573en
local.fileurl.openpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/7f464949-7885-4c66-9d5d-606f8d0e2573en
local.subject.for2020300303 Animal nutritionen
local.subject.seo2020100411 Poultryen
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/CopperMorganRobertsSwickToghyani2020JournalArticle.pdfPublished version316.48 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

15
checked on Feb 24, 2024

Page view(s)

1,102
checked on Mar 8, 2023

Download(s)

48
checked on Mar 8, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons