Farmers' Perceptions of Dairy Cattle Breeds, Breeding and Feeding Strategies: A Case of Smallholder Dairy Farmers in Western Kenya

Title
Farmers' Perceptions of Dairy Cattle Breeds, Breeding and Feeding Strategies: A Case of Smallholder Dairy Farmers in Western Kenya
Publication Date
2019
Author(s)
Lukuyu, M N
Gibson, J P
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0371-2401
Email: jgibson5@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:jgibson5
Savage, D B
Rao, E J O
Ndiwa, N
Duncan, A J
Type of document
Journal Article
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Place of publication
South Africa
DOI
10.1080/00128325.2019.1659215
UNE publication id
une:1959.11/30837
Abstract
To understand farmers' preference and perceptions of breed attributes, breeding and feeding practices, 419 households in western Kenya were interviewed in a cross-sectional survey. Respondents scored their preference for cattle breeds, traits and breeding methods on a scale of 1 (most preferred) to 5 (least preferred). Preferences were compared using multinomial logistic regression models on weighted scores. The Ayrshire breed was most preferred followed by the Friesian. Using hardship tolerance as a reference trait, the Friesian was preferred 4.86 times more for high milk production and Ayrshire, Jersey and Guernsey breeds 4.61, 4.60 and 4.18 times (p < 0.01) more, respectively, for milk fat content. The Ayrshire was preferred 4.16 times more for its perceived low feed requirement and 1.22 times more (p < 0.01) for resistance to diseases. Friesian was the only breed preferred (3.18 times more) (p < 0.01) for high growth rate of calves. Artificial insemination (AI) was the breeding method of choice, but majority (>68%) of respondents used natural mating, because it was readily available and cheaper. The current study highlights the importance of taking into account farmers' objectives and the production environment when designing breed improvement programmes and recommends packaging of breeding together with feeding interventions.
Link
Citation
East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal, 83(4), p. 351-367
ISSN
2313-450X
0012-8325
Start page
351
End page
367
Rights
Attribution 4.0 International

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink
openpublished/FarmersLukuyuGibsonSavage2019JournalArticle.pdf 1348.448 KB application/pdf Published version View document