Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30768
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMusigwa, Sostheneen
dc.contributor.authorMorgan, Natalieen
dc.contributor.authorSwick, Roberten
dc.contributor.authorCozannet, Pierreen
dc.contributor.authorWu, Shu-Biaoen
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-15T02:51:46Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-15T02:51:46Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationWorld's Poultry Science Journal, 77(1), p. 5-27en
dc.identifier.issn1743-4777en
dc.identifier.issn0043-9339en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30768-
dc.description.abstractFeed energy is an important production factor in poultry, representing 75% of the total cost of feed. Therefore, maximising energy digestion and utilisation is essential for cost-effectiveness and sustainability in poultry production. Consequently, accurate energy evaluation of raw material and animal requirements for energy is valuable for precision feeding and optimised benefits in growing chickens. Two key strategies to enhance the utilisation of energy from feed ingredients are the use of exogenous enzymes, such as carbohydrases, and accurate energy requirement prediction. Exogenous carbohydrases can enhance nutrient digestion and absorption, especially in diets with viscous ingredients, in which carbohydrases can enhance the digestibility of saturated fat and protein, by 33% and 3%, respectively, and about 4% energy utilisation. This can improve not only energy utilisation, but also gut health by reducing nutrient flow into the hindgut, as the presence of undigested nutrients fuels pathogenic bacteria proliferation. Moreover, accurate energy bioassays are required to provide values of dietary energy and true availability of energy to the birds. Currently, metabolisable energy (ME) systems are commonly used to evaluate poultry energetics. However, ME does not represent the total energy available to the birds, as it cannot measure the proportion of dietary energy that is lost as heat during feed ingestion, absorption and metabolism. In fact, the ME system can underestimate energy provided by fat by 13% and overestimate energy from proteins by 20% in chicken feeds. As net energy (NE)/ME ratio can vary from 59% to 77% depending on dietary composition, the NE systems are suggested as alternative, more accurate energy measurement methods, as they provide energy values corrected for heat increment. This paper reviews energy sources for poultry and addresses the potential to use NE measurements as a tool to evaluate the ability of feeds and feed additives to improve the exploitation of energy utilisation.en
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofWorld's Poultry Science Journalen
dc.rightsCC0 1.0 Universal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.titleOptimisation of dietary energy utilisation for poultry - a literature reviewen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/00439339.2020.1865117en
local.contributor.firstnameSostheneen
local.contributor.firstnameNatalieen
local.contributor.firstnameRoberten
local.contributor.firstnamePierreen
local.contributor.firstnameShu-Biaoen
local.subject.for2008070204 Animal Nutritionen
local.subject.seo2008830309 Poultryen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.schoolResearch Centres, Institutes, CRCsen
local.profile.schoolSchool of Environmental and Rural Scienceen
local.profile.emailsmusigw2@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailnmorga20@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailrswick@une.edu.auen
local.profile.emailswu3@une.edu.auen
local.output.categoryC1en
local.record.placeauen
local.record.institutionUniversity of New Englanden
local.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
local.format.startpage5en
local.format.endpage27en
local.identifier.scopusid85108972343en
local.peerreviewedYesen
local.identifier.volume77en
local.identifier.issue1en
local.contributor.lastnameMusigwaen
local.contributor.lastnameMorganen
local.contributor.lastnameSwicken
local.contributor.lastnameCozanneten
local.contributor.lastnameWuen
dc.identifier.staffune-id:smusigw2en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:nmorga20en
dc.identifier.staffune-id:rswicken
dc.identifier.staffune-id:swu3en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-1089-0786en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-9663-2365en
local.profile.orcid0000-0003-3376-1677en
local.profile.orcid0000-0002-1790-6015en
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.profile.roleauthoren
local.identifier.unepublicationidune:1959.11/30768en
local.date.onlineversion2021-02-01-
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
dc.identifier.academiclevelAcademicen
local.title.maintitleOptimisation of dietary energy utilisation for poultry - a literature reviewen
local.output.categorydescriptionC1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journalen
local.search.authorMusigwa, Sostheneen
local.search.authorMorgan, Natalieen
local.search.authorSwick, Roberten
local.search.authorCozannet, Pierreen
local.search.authorWu, Shu-Biaoen
local.uneassociationYesen
local.atsiresearchNoen
local.sensitive.culturalNoen
local.identifier.wosid000613366000001en
local.year.available2021en
local.year.published2021en
local.fileurl.closedpublishedhttps://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/32216807-b4c5-41c2-b99b-6c31147bc915en
local.subject.for2020300303 Animal nutritionen
local.subject.seo2020100411 Poultryen
dc.notification.token76b9524a-b4c9-424c-b5b6-ec42a864c5b2en
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
checked on Mar 16, 2024

Page view(s)

1,150
checked on Apr 2, 2023

Download(s)

6
checked on Apr 2, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons