Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30734
Title: Identification of Preferential Paths of Fossil Carbon within Water Resource Recovery Facilities via Radiocarbon Analysis
Contributor(s): Tseng, Linda Y (author); Robinson, Alice K (author); Zhang, Xiaying (author); Xu, Xiaomei (author); Southon, John (author); Hamilton, Andrew J  (author)orcid ; Sobhani, Reza (author); Stenstrom, Michael K (author); Rosso, Diego (author)
Publication Date: 2016-11-15
Early Online Version: 2016-11-02
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.6b02731
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30734
Abstract: The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reported that all carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated by water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) during treatment are modern, based on available literature. Therefore, such emissions were omitted from IPCC's greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting procedures. However, a fraction of wastewater's carbon is fossil in origin. We hypothesized that since the fossil carbon entering municipal WRRFs is mostly from soaps and detergents as dissolved organic matter, its fate can be selectively determined during the universally applied separation treatment processes. Analyzing radiocarbon at different treatment points within municipal WRRFs, we verified that the fossil content could amount to 28% in primary influent and showed varying distribution leaving different unit operations. We recorded the highest proportion of fossil carbon leaving the secondary treatment as off-gas and as solid sludge (averaged 2.08 kg fossil-CO2-emission-potential m-3 wastewater treated). By including fossil CO2, total GHG emission in municipal WRRFs increased 13%, and 23% if an on-site energy recovery system exists although much of the postdigestion fossil carbon remained in biosolids rather than in biogas, offering yet another carbon sequestration opportunity during biosolids handling. In comparison, fossil carbon contribution to GHG emission can span from negligible to substantial in different types of industrial WRRFs. With such a considerable impact, CO2 should be analyzed for each WRRF and not omitted from GHG accounting.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Environmental Science & Technology, 50(22), p. 12166-12178
Publisher: American Chemical Society
Place of Publication: United States of America
ISSN: 1520-5851
0013-936X
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 330413 Urban planning and health
400410 Wastewater treatment processes
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 180306 Measurement and assessment of freshwater quality (incl. physical and chemical conditions of water)
110503 Water recycling services (incl. sewage and greywater)
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

28
checked on Apr 6, 2024

Page view(s)

1,114
checked on Mar 8, 2023

Download(s)

2
checked on Mar 8, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.