A balanced time perspective: Is it an exercise in empiricism, and does it relate meaningfully to health and well-being outcomes?

Title
A balanced time perspective: Is it an exercise in empiricism, and does it relate meaningfully to health and well-being outcomes?
Publication Date
2019-12
Author(s)
McKay, Michael T
Worrell, Frank C
Zivkovic, Urška
Temple, Elizabeth
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5625-9298
Email: etemple3@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:etemple3
Mello, Zena R
Musil, Bojan
Cole, Jon C
Andretta, James R
Perry, John L
Type of document
Journal Article
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Place of publication
United Kingdom
DOI
10.1002/ijop.12530
UNE publication id
une:1959.11/30621
Abstract
Time perspective research assesses the degree to which thoughts and feelings about the past, present and future influence behaviour, and a balanced time perspective profile has been posited as being ideal. Although this area of research has seen a move towards person-centred analyses, using either cluster analyses or a deviation from balanced time perspective (DBTP) approach, there are a number of theoretical and methodological issues that must be addressed. Using data from diverse samples in four countries, the present study used both cluster analyses and the DBTP approach to assess how cluster membership and DBTP scores related to a range of health and well-being outcomes. As in previous studies, a balanced profile only emerged once in cluster analyses, and positive-oriented profiles were associated with optimal outcomes. The study also found evidence of a relationship between DBTP scores and scores on well-being indicators. However, results gained after manipulating the DBTP equation in two different ways again indicated that higher than expected positive past and present or past and future scores were responsible for the positive outcomes. As such, these findings raise concerns regarding the use of the DBTP construct within clinical settings.
Link
Citation
International Journal of Psychology, 54(6), p. 775-785
ISSN
1464-066X
0020-7594
Pubmed ID
30206944
Start page
775
End page
785

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink