Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30097
Title: Advancing interprofessional theory: Deliberative democracy as a participatory research antidote to power differentials in aged care
Contributor(s): Nugus, Peter (author); Ranmuthugala, Geetha  (author)orcid ; Travaglia, Joanne (author); Greenfield, David (author); Lamothe, Josianne (author); Hogden, Anne (author); Kolne, Kendall (author); Braithwaite, Jeffrey (author)
Publication Date: 2019-06
DOI: 10.1016/j.xjep.2018.09.005
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/30097
Abstract: Introduction: Interprofessional relations in health care have been examined through the frame of "clinical democracy". Yet, traditional interpretations of democracy have assumed a zero-sum, competitive interpretation of power, leading to unelaborated invocations for health professionals to "collaborate" more or do "teamwork" better. The aim of this study was to understand the priorities that health professionals from different occupations have for individual patient care, and the opportunities they have to express those priorities, as a foundation for a more expansive democratic theory.
Materials and methods: The case setting was a mixed-method, pre-post, participatory research (PR) study examining the dynamics and levels of satisfaction of interprofessional information-sharing and decision-making on an acute aged care unit.
Results: Stage 1, pre-intervention, revealed that non-medical health professionals – nursing and, in particular, allied health professionals – lacked opportunities for input into decision-making for patient care. Following deliberative, public feedback of the findings to managers and health professionals, an intervention was negotiated to re-structure the weekly case conference and referral processes. Stage 2, the post-interventional findings showed an increase in perceptions of information-sharing, and participation in case conferences, as well as recognition of power differentials in interprofessional relations.
Conclusions: In the public negotiation of increased prominence of particular roles and aligning role clarity with the needs of particular patients, the findings show that the notion of deliberative democracy characterizes the qualitative-cumulative, rather than merely quantitative-redistributive power among health professionals in different occupational roles. As a case of conscientization, deliberation engages practical interprofessional improvement simultaneously as educational empowerment.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Grant Details: ARC/LP0775514
Source of Publication: Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, v.15, p. 100-111
Publisher: Elsevier Inc
Place of Publication: United States of America
ISSN: 2405-4526
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 111702 Aged Health Care
111709 Health Care Administration
111799 Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 420301 Aged health care
420306 Health care administration
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 920299 Health and Support Services not elsewhere classified
920413 Social Structure and Health
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 200207 Social structure and health
200413 Substance abuse
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Rural Medicine

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

3
checked on Mar 16, 2024

Page view(s)

1,558
checked on Mar 7, 2023

Download(s)

2
checked on Mar 7, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.