Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29966
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Campbell, D L M | en |
dc.contributor.author | Bari, M S | en |
dc.contributor.author | Rault, J-L | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-29T02:29:31Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-29T02:29:31Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Animal Production Science, 61(10), p. 848-855 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0816-1089 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1836-5787 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1836-0939 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29966 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Free-range laying hen housing systems are prevalent in Australia and perceived by consumers to provide greater opportunities for the expression of natural behaviour resulting in higher hen welfare. However, all housing systems have both benefits and risks and scientific evidence is needed on the welfare outcomes of free-range systems. In this review, the scientific literature is summarised from the past 10 years, from research conducted within Australia or internationally with brown laying-hen strains kept in free-range systems. It compiles information on range use by laying hens, hen behaviour while on the range, factors that affect range use, and impacts of ranging on hen health and other aspects of welfare. Novel insights have come from the use of radio-frequency identification systems that allow tracking of individual hens and have shown that the majority of hens access the range with multiple visits across the day, but a small proportion of hens within most flocks choose to remain indoors. Hens also vary in which areas of the range they use, and provision of natural or man-made shelters can increase both range access and range distribution. Hens spend most of their time foraging while outdoors, but the types and frequencies of behaviours vary depending on the resources available and other factors. Range access can be linked to health benefits such as improved plumage condition and reduced footpad dermatitis but there are also health risks associated with free-range systems such as greater susceptibility to disease (e.g. spotty liver disease), heat stress, predation, and potentially parasites in comparison to loose or cage housing systems. Design of the range area, indoor shed, management practices and rearing environments can all influence how hens utilise free-range housing systems. Further research is crucially needed on the impact of ranging on hen welfare in variable Australian climatic conditions, encompassing intense heat and sunlight as well as cooler or wet environments. | en |
dc.language | en | en |
dc.publisher | CSIRO Publishing | en |
dc.relation.ispartof | Animal Production Science | en |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.title | Free-range egg production: its implications for hen welfare | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1071/AN19576 | en |
dcterms.accessRights | UNE Green | en |
local.contributor.firstname | D L M | en |
local.contributor.firstname | M S | en |
local.contributor.firstname | J-L | en |
local.subject.for2008 | 070203 Animal Management | en |
local.subject.for2008 | 070207 Humane Animal Treatment | en |
local.subject.seo2008 | 830501 Eggs | en |
local.subject.seo2008 | 830307 Minor Livestock (e.g. Alpacas, Ostriches, Crocodiles, Farmed Rabbits) | en |
local.profile.school | School of Environmental and Rural Science | en |
local.profile.school | School of Environmental and Rural Science | en |
local.profile.email | dcampb38@une.edu.au | en |
local.profile.email | mbari3@une.edu.au | en |
local.output.category | C1 | en |
local.record.place | au | en |
local.record.institution | University of New England | en |
local.publisher.place | Australia | en |
local.format.startpage | 848 | en |
local.format.endpage | 855 | en |
local.peerreviewed | Yes | en |
local.identifier.volume | 61 | en |
local.identifier.issue | 10 | en |
local.title.subtitle | its implications for hen welfare | en |
local.access.fulltext | Yes | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Campbell | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Bari | en |
local.contributor.lastname | Rault | en |
dc.identifier.staff | une-id:dcampb38 | en |
dc.identifier.staff | une-id:mbari3 | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.profile.role | author | en |
local.identifier.unepublicationid | une:1959.11/29966 | en |
local.date.onlineversion | 2020-07-21 | - |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Student | en |
dc.identifier.academiclevel | Academic | en |
local.title.maintitle | Free-range egg production | en |
local.relation.fundingsourcenote | Australian Eggs provided funding for the review. | en |
local.output.categorydescription | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal | en |
local.search.author | Campbell, D L M | en |
local.search.author | Bari, M S | en |
local.search.author | Rault, J-L | en |
local.uneassociation | Yes | en |
local.atsiresearch | No | en |
local.sensitive.cultural | No | en |
local.year.available | 2020 | - |
local.year.published | 2021 | - |
local.fileurl.openpublished | https://rune.une.edu.au/web/retrieve/7070daa5-3e6f-4514-bad3-d4dfe2bd4690 | en |
local.subject.for2020 | 300302 Animal management | en |
local.subject.for2020 | 300306 Animal welfare | en |
local.subject.seo2020 | 100601 Eggs | en |
local.subject.seo2020 | 100408 Minor livestock (e.g. alpacas, ostriches, crocodiles, farmed rabbits) | en |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Environmental and Rural Science |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format |
---|
SCOPUSTM
Citations
39
checked on Jan 11, 2025
Page view(s)
1,122
checked on Jun 11, 2023
Download(s)
4
checked on Jun 11, 2023
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License