Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29964
Title: Skeletal health of layers across all housing systems and future research directions for Australia
Contributor(s): Campbell, D L M  (author)
Publication Date: 2021
Early Online Version: 2020-08-20
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.1071/AN19578
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29964
Abstract: Modern laying hens have been selected for an astounding rate of egg production, but the physiological calcium demand takes a significant toll on their skeletal health. Bones can be assessed both in vivo and ex vivo, using a combination of different structural and mechanical analysis methods. Typically, the properties of leg, wing and keel bones are measured. Conventional caged layers are restricted in movement, which imbalances structural bone resorption and new bone formation, resulting in osteoporosis. Hens within alternative housing systems have opportunities to exercise for strengthening bones, but they can also suffer from higher rates of keel fractures and/or deviations that are likely to have resulted from collisions or pressure force. Limited research has been conducted within Australian commercial housing systems to assess hen skeletal health, including prevalence of keel damage across different system types. Research conducted on both brown and white hen strains approximately within the past decade internationally (2009 onward) has shown that skeletal health is impaired across all housing systems. Keel-bone damage is of specific concern as it occurs at high rates, particularly in multi-tiered systems, is painful, can alter hen behaviour, and reduce both production and egg quality. Management strategies such as the provision of ramps to access perches and tiers can reduce the incidence of keel-bone damage to a degree. Bone strength can be improved through exercise opportunities, particularly when available during pullet rearing. Genetic selection for high bone strength may be necessary for hens to adequately adapt to loose-housed systems, but the best strategy for improving skeletal health is likely to be multifactorial.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Animal Production Science, 61(10), p. 883-892
Publisher: CSIRO Publishing
Place of Publication: Australia
ISSN: 0816-1089
1836-5787
1836-0939
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 070203 Animal Management
070202 Animal Growth and Development
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 300302 Animal management
300301 Animal growth and development
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 830501 Eggs
830307 Minor Livestock (e.g. Alpacas, Ostriches, Crocodiles, Farmed Rabbits)
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 100601 Eggs
100408 Minor livestock (e.g. alpacas, ostriches, crocodiles, farmed rabbits)
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science

Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/SkeletalCampbell2021JournalArticle.pdfPublished version243.11 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
checked on Nov 30, 2024

Page view(s)

1,086
checked on Jun 4, 2023

Download(s)

20
checked on Jun 4, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons