Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29931
Title: A comparative modeling study on non-climatic and climatic risk assessment on Asian Tiger Mosquito (Aedes albopictus)
Contributor(s): Shabani, Farzin  (author); Tehrany, Mahyat Shafapour (author); Solhjouy-fard, Samaneh (author); Kumar, Lalit  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2018-03-19
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4474
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29931
Related Research Outputs: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4474/supp-1
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4474/supp-2
Abstract: Aedes albopictus, the Asian Tiger Mosquito, vector of Chikungunya, Dengue Fever and Zika viruses, has proven its hardy adaptability in expansion from its natural Asian, forest edge, tree hole habitat on the back of international trade transportation, re-establishing in temperate urban surrounds, in a range of water receptacles and semi-enclosures of organic matter. Conventional aerial spray mosquito vector controls focus on wetland and stagnant water expanses, proven to miss the protected hollows and crevices favoured by Ae. albopictus. New control or eradication strategies are thus essential, particular in light of potential expansions in the southeastern and eastern USA. Successful regional vector control strategies require risk level analysis. Should strategies prioritize regions with non-climatic or climatic suitability parameters for Ae. albopictus? Our study used current Ae. albopictus distribution data to develop two independent models: (i) regions with suitable non-climatic factors, and (ii) regions with suitable climate for Ae. albopictus in southeastern USA. Non-climatic model processing used Evidential Belief Function (EBF), together with six geographical conditioning factors (raster data layers), to establish the probability index. Validation of the analysis results was estimated with area under the curve (AUC) using Ae. albopictus presence data. Climatic modeling was based on two General Circulation Models (GCMs), Miroc3.2 and CSIRO-MK30 running the RCP 8.5 scenario in MaxEnt software. EBF non-climatic model results achieved a 0.70 prediction rate and 0.73 success rate, confirming suitability of the study site regions for Ae. albopictus establishment. The climatic model results showed the best-fit model comprised Coldest Quarter Mean Temp, Precipitation of Wettest Quarter and Driest Quarter Precipitation factors with mean AUC value of 0.86. Both GCMs showed that the whole study site is highly suitable and will remain suitable climatically, according to the prediction for 2055, for Ae. albopictus expansion.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: PeerJ, p. 1-25
Publisher: PeerJ, Ltd
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 2167-8359
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 050204 Environmental Impact Assessment
070308 Crop and Pasture Protection (Pests, Diseases and Weeds)
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 410402 Environmental assessment and monitoring
300409 Crop and pasture protection (incl. pests, diseases and weeds)
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 960305 Ecosystem Adaptation to Climate Change
960413 Control of Plant Pests, Diseases and Exotic Species in Farmland, Arable Cropland and Permanent Cropland Environments
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 190102 Ecosystem adaptation to climate change
180602 Control of pests, diseases and exotic species in terrestrial environments
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Description: Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4474/supp-1 and https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4474/supp-2
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/AComparativeShabaniKumar2018JournalArticle.pdfPublished version807.88 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

18
checked on Sep 21, 2024

Page view(s)

1,050
checked on Jun 18, 2023

Download(s)

22
checked on Jun 18, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons