Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29869
Title: Australia's Operation Sovereign Borders: Racial Ideologies, Metaphors and Language of Legitimation
Contributor(s): Ndhlovu, Finex  (author)orcid 
Early Online Version: 2019-07-15
Open Access: Yes
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29869
Open Access Link: https://acrawsa.org.au/2019/07/15/first-glimpse-australias-operation-sovereign-borders-racial-ideologies-metaphors-and-language-of-legitimation-by-finex-ndhlovu/Open Access Link
Abstract: The foundations of contemporary Australia have historically been tied to colonial habits and practices that extol superiority of whiteness while treating non-desired racial groups as ‘objects’ or non-beings. Immigration, border protection policies and notions of belonging and national sovereignty have always been designed to place certain restrictions on non-desired racial and ethnic groups, including Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Operation Sovereign Borders (OSB) policy is the latest measure that joins the long list of previous policies aimed at preventing the ‘influx of alien’ races into Australia. This paper seeks to advance our understanding of the various mutations of the hegemony of whiteness in Australia by drawing attention to how border politics and attendant discourses of national sovereignty have increasingly become politics of race – albeit by stealth. The paper introduces ‘vernacular discourse’ as an alternative explanatory paradigm for speaking to the internal contradictions of border protection policies. The argument is that OSB policy is a statement of national sovereignty that emphasises the need for protecting national borders that are imagined in spatial terms – as constituting a completed and closed horizontality. Such a view of Australia misses crucial points: (a) about present conditions of unprecedented voluntary and forced movements of human populations; and, (b) about Indigenous Australians’ longstanding contestation of the mainstream narrative of sovereignty. The conclusion is that OSB policy contradicts the common values of humanity in that it represents an abyssal line separating the ‘zone of being’ (whiteness) from the ‘zone of non-being’ (the racialised non-desired other).
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Critical Race and Whiteness Studies, p. 1-21
Publisher: Australian Critical Race and Whiteness Studies Association
Place of Publication: Australia
ISSN: 1838-8310
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 200405 Language in Culture and Society (Sociolinguistics)
200209 Multicultural, Intercultural and Cross-cultural Studies
200403 Discourse and Pragmatics
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 470411 Sociolinguistics
470212 Multicultural, intercultural and cross-cultural studies
470405 Discourse and pragmatics
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 970120 Expanding Knowledge in Language, Communication and Culture
950201 Communication Across Languages and Culture
959999 Cultural Understanding not elsewhere classified
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 280114 Expanding knowledge in Indigenous studies
130201 Communication across languages and culture
139999 Other culture and society not elsewhere classified
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Publisher/associated links: https://acrawsa.org.au/author/craws/
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

Page view(s)

1,740
checked on Jun 23, 2024

Download(s)

6
checked on Jun 23, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.