Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29670
Title: On the art of doing surveys among adolescents
Contributor(s): Due, P (author); Arnarsson, A M (author); Lyyra, N (author); Lofstedt, P (author); Madsen, K R (author); Thorsteinsson, E B  (author)orcid ; Valimaa, R (author); Torsheim, T (author); Damsgaard, M T (author); Eriksson, C (author)
Publication Date: 2020-09-30
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa165.1066Open Access Link
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29670
Field of Research (FoR) 2008: 111714 Mental Health
170106 Health, Clinical and Counselling Psychology
Field of Research (FoR) 2020: undefined
520302 Clinical psychology
520304 Health psychology
520303 Counselling psychology
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 920410 Mental Health
970117 Expanding Knowledge in Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 200409 Mental health
280121 Expanding knowledge in psychology
Abstract: The aim is to discuss methodological challenges for research on adolescent positive mental health. A first consideration is which questions should the measurement instrument answer. In the clinical context it should have the properties of giving enough information for making a diagnosis of high quality. In the public health context, its objective may be to give information that enables the researcher to describe trends at the population level and provide guidance on areas of intervention.
The HBSC study is monitoring the health and health behaviour of school-aged children in a public health context. It is a population survey, defined by the form of data collection and the method of analysis. The data is collected by questionnaire from a representative sample of school-aged children. It tries to answer descriptive questions (What, who, when?), but also tries to explore causal associations (Why?), given the limitations of the cross-sectional design.
Surveys have advantages: Good for gathering descriptive data; Can cover a wide range of topics. Are relatively inexpensive to use; Can include large number of respondents; and Can be analysed using a variety of existing software. Among the disadvantages can be mentioned: Self-report may lead to biased reporting; Data may provide a general picture but lack depth; Difficult to obtain adequate information on context; and Differences in understanding: it is difficult to formulate questions in such a way that it will mean exactly same thing to each respondent.
The choice of measurement tools or indicators involves both theoretical and practical issues. Multidisciplinary research teams may include different theoretical traditions, which is an asset but also make it necessary to be explicit regarding overall aims of the study. Most often the theoretical issues focus one of three topics: the value of the types of data; the relative scientific rigor of the data; or basic, underlying philosophies of evaluation.
Publication Type: Conference Publication
Conference Details: 16th World Congress on Public Health 2020, Online, 12-16 October 2020
Source of Publication: Public Health for the future of humanity: analysis, advocacy and action, v.30 (Supplement_5), p. v393
Publisher: European Journal of Public Health, Oxford University Press
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 1464-360X
1101-1262
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: E3 Extract of Scholarly Conference Publication
Appears in Collections:Conference Publication
School of Psychology

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show full item record

Page view(s)

768
checked on Dec 9, 2021

Download(s)

6
checked on Dec 9, 2021
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

 

Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.