Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29587
Title: Learning to Solve Trigonometry Problems That Involve Algebraic Transformation Skills via Learning by Analogy and Learning by Comparison
Contributor(s): Ngu, Bing Hiong  (author)orcid ; Phan, Huy P  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2020-09-25
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.558773
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29587
Abstract: The subject of mathematics is a national priority for most countries in the world. By all account, mathematics is considered as being "pure theoretical" (Becher, 1987), compared to other subjects that are "soft theoretical" or "hard applied." As such, the learning of mathematics may pose extreme difficulties for some students. Indeed, as a pure theoretical subject, mathematics is not that enjoyable and for some students, its learning can be somewhat arduous and challenging. One such example is the topical theme of Trigonometry, which is relatively complex for comprehension and understanding. This Trigonometry problem that involves algebraic transformation skills is confounded, in particular, by the location of the pronumeral (e.g., x)—whether it is a numerator sin30° = x/5 or a denominator sin30° = 5/x. More specifically, we contend that some students may have difficulties when solving sin30° = x/5, say, despite having learned how to solve a similar problem, such as x/4 = 3. For more challenging Trigonometry problems, such as sin50° = 12/x where the pronumeral is a denominator, students have been taught to “swap” the x with sin30° and then from this, solve for x. Previous research has attempted to address this issue but was unsuccessful. Learning by analogy relies on drawing a parallel between a learned problem and a new problem, whereby both share a similar solution procedure. We juxtapose a linear equation (e.g., x/4 = 3) and a Trigonometry problem (e.g., sin30° = x/5) to facilitate analogical learning. Learning by comparison, in contrast, identifies similarities and differences between two problems, thereby contributing to students’ understanding of the solution procedures for both problems. We juxtapose the two types of Trigonometry problems that differ in the location of the pronumeral (e.g., sin30° = x/5 vs. cos50° = 20/x) to encourage active comparison. Therefore, drawing on the complementary strength of learning by analogy and learning by comparison theories, we expect to counter the inherent difficulty of learning Trigonometry problems that involve algebraic transformation skills. This conceptual analysis article, overall, makes attempts to elucidate and seek clarity into the two comparative pedagogical approaches for effective learning of Trigonometry.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Frontiers in Psychology, v.11, p. 1-11
Publisher: Frontiers Research Foundation
Place of Publication: Switzerland
ISSN: 1664-1078
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 130106 Secondary Education
170103 Educational Psychology
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 390306 Secondary education
520102 Educational psychology
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 930101 Learner and Learning Achievement
930102 Learner and Learning Processes
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 160101 Early childhood education
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Education

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/LearningNguPhan2020JournalArticle.pdfPublished version3.13 MBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

9
checked on Dec 14, 2024

Page view(s)

1,758
checked on Jun 11, 2023

Download(s)

98
checked on Jun 11, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons