Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29524
Title: | Do adaptive cycles of floodplain vegetation response to inundation differ among vegetation communities? | Contributor(s): | Thapa, Rajesh (author) ; Thoms, Martin C (author) ; Reid, Michael (author) ; Parsons, Melissa (author) | Publication Date: | 2020-05 | Early Online Version: | 2019-09-11 | DOI: | 10.1002/rra.3538 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29524 | Abstract: | Flooding is a key driver of floodplain vegetation productivity. Adaptive cycles provide a model for examining the productivity of floodplain vegetation communities in response to hydrology. Accordingly, floodplain inundation drives vegetation productivity responses through an adaptive cycle of wetting (exploitation phase), wet (conservation phase), drying (release phase), and dry (reorganization phase). We examined changes in the productivity of four floodplain vegetation communities (lignum, coolibah, grass, and poplar box) through the four phases of an adaptive cycle and explore the various strategies used by these vegetation communities to cope with variation in water availability. All four vegetation communities showed significant differences in productivity, as indicated by changes in the normalized difference vegetation index between the adaptive cycle phases. Differences were evident in the total area of vegetation that showed a productivity response, the quality or the vigour of the response, the trajectory of change overtime (i.e., towards higher or lower productivity), and the probability of change. Although the four vegetation communities exhibited response patterns in relation to flooding and drying that fit the adaptive cycle model, differences were evident in the timing of transitions between the four phases and the duration spent in those phases for each vegetation community. Poplar box and coolibah communities showed a higher productivity response during the drying or release phase. By comparison, the highest productivity response for the grassland and lignum shrubland was observed during the wetting or exploitation phase. Overall, the results showed that the four vegetation communities are sensitive to the degree of wetting at different phases in the adaptive cycle. Knowledge of floodplain vegetation response in each phase of an adaptive cycle will enable better management of floodplains, as management activities can be tailored to adaptive phase patterns associated with each community. | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | River Research and Applications, 36(4), p. 553-566 | Publisher: | John Wiley & Sons Ltd | Place of Publication: | United Kingdom | ISSN: | 1535-1467 1535-1459 |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 040699 Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience not elsewhere classified | Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 370702 Ecohydrology 370901 Geomorphology and earth surface processes |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 960999 Land and Water Management of Environments not elsewhere classified | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | 180301 Assessment and management of freshwater ecosystems 180307 Rehabilitation or conservation of fresh, ground and surface water environments |
Peer Reviewed: | Yes | HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Institute for Rural Futures Journal Article School of Environmental and Rural Science School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format |
---|
SCOPUSTM
Citations
13
checked on Dec 21, 2024
Page view(s)
2,792
checked on Aug 3, 2024
Download(s)
6
checked on Aug 3, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.