Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29524
Title: Do adaptive cycles of floodplain vegetation response to inundation differ among vegetation communities?
Contributor(s): Thapa, Rajesh  (author)orcid ; Thoms, Martin C  (author)orcid ; Reid, Michael  (author)orcid ; Parsons, Melissa  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2020-05
Early Online Version: 2019-09-11
DOI: 10.1002/rra.3538
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29524
Abstract: Flooding is a key driver of floodplain vegetation productivity. Adaptive cycles provide a model for examining the productivity of floodplain vegetation communities in response to hydrology. Accordingly, floodplain inundation drives vegetation productivity responses through an adaptive cycle of wetting (exploitation phase), wet (conservation phase), drying (release phase), and dry (reorganization phase). We examined changes in the productivity of four floodplain vegetation communities (lignum, coolibah, grass, and poplar box) through the four phases of an adaptive cycle and explore the various strategies used by these vegetation communities to cope with variation in water availability. All four vegetation communities showed significant differences in productivity, as indicated by changes in the normalized difference vegetation index between the adaptive cycle phases. Differences were evident in the total area of vegetation that showed a productivity response, the quality or the vigour of the response, the trajectory of change overtime (i.e., towards higher or lower productivity), and the probability of change. Although the four vegetation communities exhibited response patterns in relation to flooding and drying that fit the adaptive cycle model, differences were evident in the timing of transitions between the four phases and the duration spent in those phases for each vegetation community. Poplar box and coolibah communities showed a higher productivity response during the drying or release phase. By comparison, the highest productivity response for the grassland and lignum shrubland was observed during the wetting or exploitation phase. Overall, the results showed that the four vegetation communities are sensitive to the degree of wetting at different phases in the adaptive cycle. Knowledge of floodplain vegetation response in each phase of an adaptive cycle will enable better management of floodplains, as management activities can be tailored to adaptive phase patterns associated with each community.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: River Research and Applications, 36(4), p. 553-566
Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Place of Publication: United Kingdom
ISSN: 1535-1467
1535-1459
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 040699 Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience not elsewhere classified
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 370702 Ecohydrology
370901 Geomorphology and earth surface processes
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 960999 Land and Water Management of Environments not elsewhere classified
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 180301 Assessment and management of freshwater ecosystems
180307 Rehabilitation or conservation of fresh, ground and surface water environments
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Institute for Rural Futures
Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science
School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

13
checked on Nov 9, 2024

Page view(s)

2,792
checked on Aug 3, 2024

Download(s)

6
checked on Aug 3, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.