Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29497
Title: Effects of isometric resistance training on resting blood pressure: individual participant data meta-analysis
Contributor(s): Smart, Neil A  (author)orcid ; Way, Damien (author); Carlson, Debra (author); Millar, Philip (author); McGowan, Cheri (author); Swaine, Ian (author); Baross, Anthony (author); Howden, Reuben (author); Ritti-Dias, Raphael (author); Wiles, Jim (author); Cornelissen, Veronique (author); Gordon, Ben (author); Taylor, Rod (author); Bleile, Bea  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2019-10
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002105
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29497
Abstract: 

Background: Previous meta-analyses based on aggregate group-level data report antihypertensive effects of isometric resistance training (IRT). However, individual participant data meta-analyses provide more robust effect size estimates and permit examination of demographic and clinical variables on IRT effectiveness.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search and individual participant data (IPD) analysis, using both a one-step and two-step approach, of controlled trials investigating at least 3 weeks of IRT on resting systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressure.

Results: Anonymized individual participant data were provided from 12 studies (14 intervention group comparisons) involving 326 participants (52.7% medicated for hypertension); 191 assigned to IRT and 135 controls, 25.2% of participants had diagnosed coronary artery disease. IRT intensity varied (8–30% MVC) and training duration ranged from 3 to 12 weeks. The IPD (one-step) meta-analysis showed a significant treatment effect for the exercise group participants experiencing a reduction in resting SBP of −6.22 mmHg (95% CI −7.75 to −4.68; P < 0.00001); DBP of −2.78 mmHg (95% CI −3.92 to −1.65; P = 0.002); and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) of −4.12 mmHg (95% CI −5.39 to −2.85; P < 0.00001). The two-step approach yielded similar results for change in SBP −7.35 mmHg (−8.95 to −5.75; P < 0.00001), DBP MD −3.29 mmHg (95% CI −5.12 to −1.46; P = 0.0004) and MAP MD −4.63 mmHg (95% CI −6.18 to −3.09: P < 0.00001). Sub-analysis revealed that neither clinical, medication, nor demographic participant characteristics, or exercise program features, modified the IRT treatment effect.

Conclusion: This individual patient analysis confirms a clinically meaningful and statistically significant effect of IRT on resting SBP, DBP and mean arterial blood pressure.

Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Journal of Hypertension, 37(10), p. 1927-1938
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Place of Publication: United States of America
ISSN: 1473-5598
0263-6352
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 110201 Cardiology (incl. Cardiovascular Diseases)
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 320101 Cardiology (incl. cardiovascular diseases)
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 920412 Preventive Medicine
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 200412 Preventive medicine
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Science and Technology

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/EffectsSmart2019JournalArticle.pdfPublished version447.5 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

65
checked on Nov 2, 2024

Page view(s)

1,414
checked on Jun 18, 2023

Download(s)

142
checked on Jun 18, 2023
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons