Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29469
Title: | Understanding the Relationship between Intention and Cat Containment Behaviour: A Case Study of Kitten and Cat Adopters from RSPCA Queensland | Contributor(s): | McLeod, Lynette J (author) ; Evans, Di (author); Jones, Bidda (author); Paterson, Mandy (author); Zito, Sarah (author) | Publication Date: | 2020-07-16 | Open Access: | Yes | DOI: | 10.3390/ani10071214 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29469 | Abstract: | In Australia, cat owners are encouraged to keep their pet cats contained on their property at all times. This study explores the relationship between the intentions and behaviours of 72 kitten and cat adopters from a RSPCA Queensland animal shelter, to provide a more in-depth understanding of the factors influencing the adoption of cat containment behaviours. At the time of adoption, 64 participants (89%) indicated they were intending to keep their cat fully contained. Eight weeks after adoption, 63 participants (87%) reported they were doing so (59 who had stated their intention at the time of adoption, and 4 who had not). We found cat owner containment behaviour was moderately correlated with containment intentions. For some of the participants when it came to enacting this behaviour, their intentions and the provided education information was not enough to overcome the more compelling capability, opportunity and motivational factors which presented themselves once they got home. We were able to identify these factors and suggest additional behaviour change strategies that would assist. Although it is important to provide cat adopters with advice about how to contain their cats properly, these results also highlight the importance of focusing attention on other behaviour change strategies that address the particular barriers faced by some cat-owners who are unsuccessful in keeping their cat contained on their property. | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | Animals, 10(7), p. 1-16 | Publisher: | MDPI AG | Place of Publication: | Switzerland | ISSN: | 2076-2615 | Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 170199 Psychology not elsewhere classified | Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 310901 Animal behaviour | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 960411 Control of Pests, Diseases and Exotic Species in Urban and Industrial Environments | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | 180302 Control of pests, diseases and exotic species in fresh, ground and surface water 180204 Control of pests, diseases and exotic species in coastal and estuarine environments 180602 Control of pests, diseases and exotic species in terrestrial environments |
Peer Reviewed: | Yes | HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Psychology |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
openpublished/UnderstandingMcLeod2020JournalArticle.pdf | Published version | 1.2 MB | Adobe PDF Download Adobe | View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
9
checked on Dec 28, 2024
Page view(s)
2,132
checked on Jul 14, 2024
Download(s)
132
checked on Jul 14, 2024
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License