Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29333
Title: Potentially inappropriate prescribing for adults with diabetes mellitus: a scoping review protocol
Contributor(s): Ayalew, Mohammed B  (author); Dieberg, Gudrun  (author)orcid ; Quirk, Frances  (author); Spark, M Joy  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2020-07
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00136
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29333
Abstract: Objective: This scoping review aims to explore and map studies investigating potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) for adults with diabetes mellitus.
Introduction: Inappropriate prescribing for people with diabetes mellitus has been reported by various authors focusing on different aspects of inappropriateness. A preliminary search revealed no published reviews on PIP for adults with diabetes mellitus. As a result, it is difficult to obtain a comprehensive map of PIP in this patient group.
Inclusion criteria: This scoping review will consider all studies on PIP for adults with the diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus from any clinical setting. Studies conducted in pediatric populations or in adults with pre-diabetes or gestational diabetes will be excluded.
Methods: A three-step search strategy (i.e. an initial limited search in PubMed and ProQuest Central databases, a main search of eight databases and gray literature, and manual searches of reference lists of included articles) will be utilized. No language restrictions will be applied. All retrieved articles will be screened against the inclusion/exclusion criteria at title, abstract, and full-text stages. Data to be extracted from each study will include, but not be limited to, country, objective, study population, study methodology, type of PIP studied, examples of PIP events, medications involved, and criteria used for PIP identification. Data will be extracted by study team members using an online application for conducting systematic synthesis of evidence.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: JBI Evidence Synthesis, 18(7), p. 1557-1565
Publisher: Wolters Kluwer Health
Place of Publication: Australia
ISSN: 2689-8381
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 111503 Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice
111599 Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences not elsewhere classified
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 321403 Clinical pharmacy and pharmacy practice
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 920104 Diabetes
920299 Health and Support Services not elsewhere classified
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 200101 Diagnosis of human diseases and conditions
200206 Health system performance (incl. effectiveness of programs)
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Rural Medicine
School of Science and Technology

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons