Blood pressure control in older adults with hypertension: A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression

Baffour-Awuah, Biggie; Dieberg, Gudrun; Pearson, Melissa J; Smart, Neil A

doi:10.1016/j.ijchy.2020.100040

Author(s)

Baffour-Awuah, Biggie

Dieberg, Gudrun

Pearson, Melissa J

Smart, Neil A

Publication Date

2020-09

Abstract

Supplementary data to this article can be found online athttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchy.2020.100040.

Abstract

Background: Managing blood pressure reduces CVD risk, but optimal treatment thresholds remain unclear as it is a balancing act to avoid hypotension-related adverse events. Objectives: This systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression evaluated the benefits of intensive BP treatment in hypertensive older adults. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library of Controlled Trials until January 31, 2020. Studies comparing different BP treatments/targets and/or active BP against placebo treatment, with a minimum 12months follow-up, were included. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% CIs were calculated using a random effects model. The primary outcome was RR of major cardiovascular events (MCEs); secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, heart failure (HF), cardiovascular (CV) mortality, and all-cause mortality. Results: We included 16 studies totaling 65,890 hypertensive participants (average age 69.4years) with a follow-up period from 1.8 to 4.9 years. Intensive BP treatment significantly reduced the relative risk of MCEs by 26% (RR:0.74, 95%CI 0.64–0.86, p=0.000; I²=79.71%). RR of MI significantly reduced by 13% (RR:0.87, 95%CI 0.76–1.00, p=0.052; I²=0.00%), stroke by 28% (RR:0.72, 95%CI 0.64–0.82, p=0.000; I²=32.45%), HF by 47% (RR:0.53, 95% CI 0.43–0.66, p=0.000; I²=1.23%), and CV mortality by 24% (RR:0.76, 95%CI 0.66–0.89, p=0.000; I²=39.74%). All-cause mortality reduced by 17% (RR:0.83, 95%CI 0.73–0.93, p=0.001; I²=53.09%). Of the participants - 61% reached BP targets and 5% withdrew; with 1 hypotension-related event per 780 people treated. Conclusions: Lower BP treatment targets are optimal for CV protection, effective, well-tolerated and safe, and support the latest hypertension guidelines.

Citation

International Journal of Cardiology Hypertension, v.6, p. 1-9

ISSN

2590-0862

Link

https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29331

Language

en

Publisher

Elsevier Inc

Rights

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Title

Blood pressure control in older adults with hypertension: A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression

Type of document

Journal Article

Entity Type

Publication

Author(s)	Baffour-Awuah, Biggie Dieberg, Gudrun Pearson, Melissa J Smart, Neil A
Publication Date	2020-09
Abstract	Supplementary data to this article can be found online athttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchy.2020.100040.
Abstract	<i>Background:</i> Managing blood pressure reduces CVD risk, but optimal treatment thresholds remain unclear as it is a balancing act to avoid hypotension-related adverse events. <br/> <i>Objectives:</i> This systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression evaluated the benefits of intensive BP treatment in hypertensive older adults. <br/> <i>Methods:</i> We systematically searched PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library of Controlled Trials until January 31, 2020. Studies comparing different BP treatments/targets and/or active BP against placebo treatment, with a minimum 12months follow-up, were included. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% CIs were calculated using a random effects model. The primary outcome was RR of major cardiovascular events (MCEs); secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, heart failure (HF), cardiovascular (CV) mortality, and all-cause mortality. <br/> <i>Results:</i> We included 16 studies totaling 65,890 hypertensive participants (average age 69.4years) with a follow-up period from 1.8 to 4.9 years. Intensive BP treatment significantly reduced the relative risk of MCEs by 26% (RR:0.74, 95%CI 0.64–0.86, p=0.000; I²=79.71%). RR of MI significantly reduced by 13% (RR:0.87, 95%CI 0.76–1.00, p=0.052; I²=0.00%), stroke by 28% (RR:0.72, 95%CI 0.64–0.82, p=0.000; I²=32.45%), HF by 47% (RR:0.53, 95% CI 0.43–0.66, p=0.000; I²=1.23%), and CV mortality by 24% (RR:0.76, 95%CI 0.66–0.89, p=0.000; I²=39.74%). All-cause mortality reduced by 17% (RR:0.83, 95%CI 0.73–0.93, p=0.001; I²=53.09%). Of the participants - 61% reached BP targets and 5% withdrew; with 1 hypotension-related event per 780 people treated. <br/> <i>Conclusions:</i> Lower BP treatment targets are optimal for CV protection, effective, well-tolerated and safe, and support the latest hypertension guidelines.
Citation	International Journal of Cardiology Hypertension, v.6, p. 1-9
ISSN	2590-0862
Link	https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/29331
Language	en
Publisher	Elsevier Inc
Rights	Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Title	Blood pressure control in older adults with hypertension: A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression
Type of document	Journal Article
Entity Type	Publication

Blood pressure control in older adults with hypertension: A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression

Files: