A Comparative Study of Field Nematode Communities over a Decade of Cotton Production in Australia

Title
A Comparative Study of Field Nematode Communities over a Decade of Cotton Production in Australia
Publication Date
2020-01
Author(s)
Knox, Oliver
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0414-5771
Email: oknox@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:oknox
Backhouse, David
( author )
OrcID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0663-6002
Email: dbackhou@une.edu.au
UNE Id une-id:dbackhou
Gupta, Vadakattu
Type of document
Journal Article
Language
en
Entity Type
Publication
Publisher
MDPI AG
Place of publication
Switzerland
DOI
10.3390/agronomy10010123
UNE publication id
une:1959.11/29029
Abstract
Soil nematode populations have the potential to indicate ecosystem disturbances. In response to questions about nematode interactions with soilborne diseases and whether genetically modified cotton altered nematode populations, several fields in the Namoi cotton growing area of Australia were sampled between 2005 and 2007. No significant interactions were observed, but nematodes numbers were low and postulated to be due to the use of the nematicide aldicarb. Aldicarb was removed from the system in 2011 and in 2015 funding allowed some fields to be resampled to determine if there had been a change in the nematode numbers following aldicarb removal. No significant changes in the total nematode numbers were observed, implying that the removal of aldicarb had little impact on the total nematode population size. However, an increase in plant parasitic nematodes was observed in both fields, but the species identified and the levels of change were not considered a threat to cotton production nor driven solely by altered pesticide chemistry. Additionally, greater numbers of higher order coloniser-persisters in the 2015 samples suggests that the current cotton production system is less disruptive to the soil ecosystem than that of a decade ago.
Link
Citation
Agronomy, 10(1), p. 1-12
ISSN
2073-4395
Start page
1
End page
12
Rights
Attribution 4.0 International

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink
openpublished/AComparativeKnoxBackhouse2020JournalArticle.pdf 1328.512 KB application/pdf Published version View document