Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/28993
Title: Suitability of litter amendments for the Australian chicken meat industry
Contributor(s): Cockerill, S A (author); Gerber, P F  (author)orcid ; Walkden-Brown, S W  (author)orcid ; Dunlop, M W (author)
Publication Date: 2020
Early Online Version: 2020-05-19
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.1071/AN19587Open Access Link
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/28993
Abstract: The Australian chicken meat indutstry is rapidly expanding due to the increasing consumption of chicken meat. As a result, the industry has growing issues of sourcing new bedding materials and disposing of spent litter, which can be attributed, in part, to a lack of widespread litter re-use for rearing chickens. According to insights and perspectives recently gathered from industry stakeholders, it is believed that re-using litter will become more common in the future, so as to reduce production costs and ease pressures on both the supply of new bedding materials and disposal of spent litter. However, there are potential risks that need to be addressed if litter re-use increases, particularly with regard to the production and mitigation of ammonia, which can negatively affect chicken health if not managed correctly. The present review discusses the potential benefits reported for different types of litter amendments, which have the primary goal of reducing ammonia volatilisation, but may also contribute to improvements in bird performance, welfare, pathogen loads, fertiliser value of spent litter, and reduced costs associated with purchasing new bedding materials. Acidifiers have been shown to be the most effective of all amendment types, with sodium bisulfate or alum being among the most commonly tested products mentioned in research literature. Litter amendments are currently rarely used in Australia, but it is hoped that the information provided in the present review, based mostly on overseas usage and research, will help inform future decision-making on the use of these products in Australian poultry production systems.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: Animal Production Science, 60(12), p. 1469-1481
Publisher: CSIRO Publishing
Place of Publication: Australia
ISSN: 1836-5787
1836-0939
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 070299 Animal Production not elsewhere classified
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 300302 Animal management
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 830309 Poultry
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 100411 Poultry
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Environmental and Rural Science

Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
openpublished/SuitabilityGerberWalkden-Brown2020JournalArticle.pdfPublished version468.51 kBAdobe PDF
Download Adobe
View/Open
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

11
checked on Apr 27, 2024

Page view(s)

1,240
checked on May 5, 2024

Download(s)

100
checked on May 5, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons