Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/28969
Title: | Effect of selection and selective genotyping for creation of reference on bias and accuracy of genomic prediction | Contributor(s): | Gowane, Gopal R (author); Lee, Sang Hong (author); Clark, Sam (author)![]() ![]() ![]() |
Publication Date: | 2019 | Open Access: | Yes | DOI: | 10.1111/jbg.12420 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/28969 | Abstract: | Reference populations for genomic selection usually involve selected individuals, which may result in biased prediction of estimated genomic breeding values (GEBV). In a simulation study, bias and accuracy of GEBV were explored for various genetic models with individuals selectively genotyped in a typical nucleus breeding program. We compared the performance of three existing methods, that is, Best Linear Unbiased Prediction of breeding values using pedigree-based relationships (PBLUP), genomic relationships for genotyped animals only (GBLUP) and a Single-Step approach (SSGBLUP) using both. For a scenario with no-selection and random mating (RR), prediction was unbiased. However, lower accuracy and bias were observed for scenarios with selection and random mating (SR) or selection and positive assortative mating (SA). As expected, bias disappeared when all individuals were genotyped and used in GBLUP. SSGBLUP showed higher accuracy compared to GBLUP, and bias of prediction was negligible with SR. However, PBLUP and SSGBLUP still showed bias in SA due to high inbreeding. SSGBLUP and PBLUP were unbiased provided that inbreeding was accounted for in the relationship matrices. Selective genotyping based on extreme phenotypic contrasts increased the prediction accuracy, but prediction was biased when using GBLUP. SSGBLUP could correct the biasedness while gaining higher accuracy than GBLUP. In a typical animal breeding program, where it is too expensive to genotype all animals, it would be appropriate to genotype phenotypically contrasting selection candidates and use a Single-Step approach to obtain accurate and unbiased prediction of GEBV. | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 136(5), p. 390-407 | Publisher: | Wiley-Blackwell Verlag GmbH | Place of Publication: | Germany | ISSN: | 1439-0388 0931-2668 |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 070201 Animal Breeding 060412 Quantitative Genetics (incl. Disease and Trait Mapping Genetics) 060408 Genomics |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 300305 Animal reproduction and breeding 310506 Gene mapping 310509 Genomics |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 830399 Livestock Raising not elsewhere classified | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | 100407 Insects | Peer Reviewed: | Yes | HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Environmental and Rural Science |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
open/EffectClarkMoghaddarVanDerWerf2018JournalArticlePrePeer.pdf | Open access version | 1.34 MB | Adobe PDF Download Adobe | View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
22
checked on Aug 31, 2024
Page view(s)
1,242
checked on May 12, 2024
Download(s)
246
checked on May 12, 2024
Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.