Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/28959
Title: | The Impact of Pre-Slaughter Stress on Beef Eating Quality | Contributor(s): | Loudon, Kate M W (author); Tarr, Garth (author); Lean, Ian J (author); Polkinghorne, Rod (author); McGilchrist, Peter (author) ; Dunshea, Frank R (author); Gardner, Graham E (author); Pethick, David W (author) | Publication Date: | 2019-09 | Open Access: | Yes | DOI: | 10.3390/ani9090612 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/28959 | Abstract: | The study evaluated the relationship between pre-slaughter stress, plasma biomarkers and consumer-evaluated eating quality of pasture raised beef cattle (n = 488). The design tested steer only, heifer only and mixed sex cattle with a comparison of direct kill versus a 14 day rest period in abattoir holding paddocks prior to slaughter. Experiment One sourced cattle from four farms and tested shipping and road transport. Experiment Two sourced cattle from four farms and tested a commercial saleyard pathway. The impact on treatment on untrained consumer eating quality scores were tested on five muscle groups, m. psoas major, m. longissimus dorsi lumborum, m. biceps femoris, m. semitendinosis, and m. infraspinatus. Across all muscles, a two-week rest period had the biggest improvement in sensory score. Mixed groups scored lower in the outside muscle than non-mixed groups. However, the mixing response was inconsistent in the eye round muscle and not significant in the other muscles. Plasma glucose and L-lactate indicated a marked acute stress response at slaughter with a small detrimental impact on consumer score. The muscle damage enzyme markers creatine kinase (CK) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were strongly associated with a lower meat quality score (MQ4). Neither β-hydroxybutyrate (βHB) nor non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) were associated with MQ4, suggesting that fat mobilisation does not impact consumer sensory score. | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | Animals, 9(9), p. 1-14 | Publisher: | MDPI AG | Place of Publication: | Switzerland | ISSN: | 2076-2615 | Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 070203 Animal Management | Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 300302 Animal management | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 830599 Primary Animal Products not elsewhere classified 830301 Beef Cattle |
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | 100401 Beef cattle | Peer Reviewed: | Yes | HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Journal Article School of Environmental and Rural Science |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
openpublished/TheImpactPolkinghorneMcGilchrist2019JournalArticle.pdf | Published version | 1.01 MB | Adobe PDF Download Adobe | View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
20
checked on Nov 2, 2024
Page view(s)
1,170
checked on Jun 30, 2024
Download(s)
48
checked on Jun 30, 2024
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License