Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/28826
Title: Punitive attitudes across geographical areas: Exploring the rural/urban divide in Canada
Contributor(s): Mulrooney, Kyle  (author)orcid ; Wise, Jenny  (author)orcid 
Publication Date: 2019-11
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.18061/1811/88730Open Access Link
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/28826
Abstract: The public is a powerful political actor when it comes to the question of what is to be done about law and order. Therefore, public attitudes towards punishment are of central importance to criminological inquiry. Research in this area has tended towards national (comparative) accounts of 'punitive attitudes' and, in an effort to explore correlates of punitive attitudes, particular sub-groups have been examined often based on certain demographic characteristics such as, for instance, race, gender and/or age. However, very little research exists exploring urban and rural variations in punitive attitudes. Yet, considering that populations may be widely dispersed from central metropolitan and urban areas to rural, regional and very remote areas, it is reasonable to assume that ecological factors and aspects of cultural geography impact upon punitive attitudes. To comparatively examine punitive attitudes across geographical areas, this study draws on cross-sectional data (2004-2015) derived from the Canadian Elections Study (CES). Specifically, the research employs a multidimensional measurement of punitive attitudes by exploring geographic variations in respondents' attitudes towards: (i) the goals of punishment; (ii) the intensity of penal sanctions; and (iii) specified forms of penal sanctions. The sum of the data is then drawn together to develop an index of punitivity, thereby providing a more holistic understanding of punitive attitudes. The findings indicate that on each measure the rural holds significantly greater punitive attitudes than the urban. The article concludes by considering theoretical explanations for these differences, of which future research should attend, with particular attention to the shared political logic between penal populism and political populism and how this contributes to the urban/rural divide as one of the greatest political fault lines in present day politics.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Source of Publication: International Journal of Rural Criminology, 5(1), p. 19-46
Publisher: Ohio State University Libraries
Place of Publication: United States of America
ISSN: 2768-3109
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 160204 Criminological Theories
160504 Crime Policy
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 440205 Criminological theories
440702 Crime policy
440203 Courts and sentencing
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 940403 Criminal Justice
940202 Electoral Systems
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 230402 Crime prevention
230202 Electoral systems
230403 Criminal justice
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Publisher/associated links: https://kb.osu.edu/handle/1811/51122
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
School of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences

Files in This Item:
3 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record

Page view(s)

1,466
checked on Jun 23, 2024

Download(s)

4
checked on Jun 23, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons