Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/28767
Title: Symptom screening scales for detecting major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis of reliability, validity and diagnostic utility
Contributor(s): Stockings, Emily (author); Degenhardt, Louisa (author); Lee, Yong Yi (author); Mihalopoulos, Cathrine (author); Liu, Angus (author); Hobbs, Megan  (author)orcid ; Patton, George (author)
Publication Date: 2015-03-15
Early Online Version: 2014-12-06
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.11.061
Handle Link: https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/28767
Abstract: Background: Depression symptom screening scales are often used to determine a clinical diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD) in prevention research. The aim of this review is to systematically examine the reliability, validity and diagnostic utility of commonly used screening scales in depression prevention research among children and adolescents. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the electronic databases PsycINFO, PsycEXTRA and Medline examining the reliability, validity and diagnostic utility of four commonly used depression symptom rating scales among children and adolescents: the Children׳s Depression Inventory (CDI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Center for Epidemiologic Studies – Depression Scale (CES-D) and the Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale (RADS). We used univariate and bivariate random effects models to pool data and conducted metaregression to identify and explain causes of heterogeneity. Results: We identified 54 studies (66 data points, 34,542 participants). Across the four scales, internal reliability was ‘good’ (pooled estimate: 0.89, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.86–0.92). Sensitivity and specificity were ‘moderate’ (sensitivity: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.76–0.84; specificity: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.74–0.83). For studies that used a diagnostic interview to determine a diagnosis of MDD, positive predictive power for identifying true cases was mostly poor. Psychometric properties did not differ on the basis of study quality, sample type (clinical vs. nonclinical) or sample age (child vs. adolescent). Limitations: Some analyses may have been underpowered to identify conditions in which test performance may vary, due to low numbers of studies with adequate data. Conclusions: Commonly used depression symptom rating scales are reliable measures of depressive symptoms among adolescents; however, using cutoff scores to indicate clinical levels of depression may result in many false positives.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Grant Details: NHMRC/1041131
Source of Publication: Journal of Affective Disorders, v.174, p. 447-463
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Place of Publication: Netherlands
ISSN: 1573-2517
0165-0327
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: 110319 Psychiatry (incl. Psychotherapy)
111714 Mental Health
170109 Personality, Abilities and Assessment
Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: 320221 Psychiatry (incl. psychotherapy)
420313 Mental health services
520108 Testing, assessment and psychometrics
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 920410 Mental Health
920501 Child Health
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 200409 Mental health
200506 Neonatal and child health
200501 Adolescent health
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
1 files
File SizeFormat 
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

174
checked on Jul 20, 2024

Page view(s)

878
checked on May 19, 2024

Download(s)

2
checked on May 19, 2024
Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.