Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Reboot Online: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing an Online Multidisciplinary Pain Management Program with Usual Care for Chronic Pain
Contributor(s): Smith, Jessica (author); Faux, Steven G (author); Gardner, Tania (author); Hobbs, Megan J  (author)orcid ; James, Matthew A (author); Joubert, Amy E (author); Kladnitski, Natalie (author); Newby, Jill M (author); Schultz, Regina (author); Shiner, Christine T (author); Andrews, Gavin (author)
Publication Date: 2019-12
Early Online Version: 2019-09-09
Open Access: Yes
DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnz208Open Access Link
Handle Link:
Field of Research (FoR) 2008: 110319 Psychiatry (incl. Psychotherapy)
111714 Mental Health
170106 Health, Clinical and Counselling Psychology
Field of Research (FoR) 2020: 320221 Psychiatry (incl. psychotherapy)
520303 Counselling psychology
520302 Clinical psychology
520304 Health psychology
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: 920410 Mental Health
920209 Mental Health Services
920204 Evaluation of Health Outcomes
Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: 200409 Mental health
200305 Mental health services
200202 Evaluation of health outcomes
Abstract: Objective: Chronic pain is a prevalent and burdensome condition. Reboot Online was developed to address treatment barriers traditionally associated with accessing face-to-face chronic pain management programs. It is a comprehensive multidisciplinary online treatment program, based on an existing and effective face-to-face multidisciplinary pain program (the Reboot program). Design & Participants: A CONSORT-compliant randomized controlled trial was conducted, enrolling adults who had experienced pain for three months or longer. Methods: Participants were randomly allocated to either an eight-lesson multidisciplinary pain management program, Reboot Online (N=41), or to a usual care (UC) control group (N=39). Clinical oversight was provided by a multidisciplinary team remotely, including physiotherapists and clinical psychologists. Participants were measured at baseline, post-treatment (week 16), and three-month follow-up (week 28). Results: Intention-to-treat analyses revealed that Reboot Online was significantly more effective than UC at increasing pain self-efficacy (g=0.69) at post-treatment, and these gains were maintained at follow-up. Similarly, Reboot Online was significantly more effective than UC on several secondary measures at post-treatment and follow-up, including movement-based fear avoidance and pain-related disability, but it did not significantly reduce pain interference or depression compared with UC. Clinician input was minimal, and adherence to Reboot Online was moderate, with 61% of participants (N=25) completing all eight lessons. Conclusions: Reboot Online presents a novel approach to multidisciplinary pain management and offers an accessible, efficacious alternative and viable treatment option for chronic pain management.
Publication Type: Journal Article
Grant Details: NHMRC/1037787
Source of Publication: Pain Medicine, 20(12), p. 2385-2396
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Place of Publication: United States of America
ISSN: 1526-4637
Peer Reviewed: Yes
HERDC Category Description: C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal
Appears in Collections:Journal Article

Files in This Item:
2 files
File Description SizeFormat 
Show full item record


checked on Nov 30, 2021

Page view(s)

checked on Dec 6, 2021


checked on Dec 6, 2021
Google Media

Google ScholarTM





Items in Research UNE are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.