Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/28584
Title: | Prospects for sustainability of pig production in relation to climate change and novel feed resources | Contributor(s): | Rauw, Wendy M (author); Rydhmer, Lotta (author); Kyriazakis, Ilias (author); Overland, Margareth (author); Gilbert, Helene (author); Dekkers, Jack C M (author); Hermesch, Susanne (author) ; Bouquet, Alban (author); Gomez Izquierdo, Emilio (author); Louveau, Isabelle (author); Gomez-Raya, Luis (author) | Publication Date: | 2020-07 | Early Online Version: | 2020-02-20 | Open Access: | Yes | DOI: | 10.1002/jsfa.10338 | Handle Link: | https://hdl.handle.net/1959.11/28584 | Abstract: | Pig production systems provide multiple benefits to humans. However, the global increase in meat consumption has profound consequences for our earth. This perspective describes two alternative scenarios for improving the sustainability of future pig production systems. The first scenario is a high input–high output system based on sustainable intensification, maximizing animal protein production efficiency on a limited land surface at the same time as minimizing environmental impacts. The second scenario is a reduced input–reduced output system based on selecting animals that are more robust to climate change and are better adapted to transform low quality feed (local feeds, feedstuff co‐products, food waste) into meat. However, in contrast to the first scenario, the latter scenario results in reduced predicted yields, reduced production efficiency and possibly increased costs to the consumer. National evaluation of the availability of local feed and feedstuff co‐product alternatives, determination of limits to feed sourced from international markets, available land for crop and livestock production, desired production levels, and a willingness to politically enforce policies through subsidies and/or penalties are some of the considerations to combine these two scenarios. Given future novel sustainable alternatives to livestock animal protein, it may become reasonable to move towards an added general premium price on 'protein from livestock animals' to the benefit of promoting higher incomes to farmers at the same time as covering the extra costs of, politically enforced, welfare of livestock animals in sustainable production systems. | Publication Type: | Journal Article | Source of Publication: | Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 100(9), p. 3575-3586 | Publisher: | John Wiley & Sons Ltd | Place of Publication: | United Kingdom | ISSN: | 1097-0010 0022-5142 |
Fields of Research (FoR) 2008: | 070201 Animal Breeding | Fields of Research (FoR) 2020: | 300305 Animal reproduction and breeding | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2008: | 830308 Pigs | Socio-Economic Objective (SEO) 2020: | 100410 Pigs | Peer Reviewed: | Yes | HERDC Category Description: | C1 Refereed Article in a Scholarly Journal |
---|---|
Appears in Collections: | Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit (AGBU) Journal Article |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
openpublished/ProspectsHermesch2020JournalArticle.pdf | Published version | 538.59 kB | Adobe PDF Download Adobe | View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
73
checked on Jan 11, 2025
Page view(s)
2,310
checked on Apr 21, 2024
Download(s)
158
checked on Apr 21, 2024
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License